SOLLICITUDO
REI SOCIALIS:
The Social Concerns of the Church
.
Names East-West blocs and other "structures of sin" that hinder development of poor nations. Calls for solidarity and for an option for the poor by affluent nations. |
Issues 1. The gap between rich and poor nations is widening; the gap between rich and poor also exists within nations. 2. Rich nations harm poor nations by manipulating economic and social mechanisms. 3. East-West polarization has retarded growth in poor nations, and oriented the world toward self-destruction. 4. Production, trade and stockpiling of arms has increased refugees and terrorism in poor countries. 5. Excessive availability of material goods for the few promotes greed, consumerism and waste. 6. The resources of nature are used selfishly and wastefully; the environment is being polluted. 7. "Structures of sin" are generated by thirst for profit and power with intent of domination. 8. Economic and political decisions hide forms of idolatry of money, ideology, class, technology. 9. Humanity needs greater international ordering to serve all peoples of the world. |
Responses 1. Spread church social teaching more widely. especially the option for the poor and the obligation to work for the development of all peoples. 2. Generate political will to create just mechanisms for the common good of humaniry. 3. Change and update political structure of East and West to promote integral development of individuals and peoples. 4. Devote the resources used for arms to alleviating human misery. 5. Recognize the injustice of the few having so much and the many having almost nothing. 6. Plan development with respect for nature: human dominion over the earth is not absolute. 7. Call for conversion to solidarity-commitmen to the common good-in light of inter¬dependence. 8. Recognize that moral evil underlies the structures which hinder the full development of peoples. 9. Reform world trade, and financial systems: establish regional cooperation to reduce dependence on rich nations. |
SOLLICITUDO
REI SOCIALIS
To the Bishops, Priests, Religious families, sons and daughters
of the Church and all people of good will, for the twentieth anniversary
of Populorum Progression
Venerable Brothers and dear Sons and Daughters, Health and the Apostolic
Blessing!
1. The social concern of the Church, directed towards an authentic
development of man and society which would respect and promote all
the dimensions of the human person, has always expressed itself
in the most varied ways. In recent years, one of the special means
of intervention has been the Magisterium of the Roman Pontiffs which,
beginning with the Encyclical Rerum Novarum of Leo XIII as a point
of reference,[1] has frequently dealt with the question and has
sometimes made the dates of publication of the various social documents
coincide with the anniversaries of that first document.[2]
The Popes have not failed to throw fresh light by means of those
messages upon new aspects of the social doctrine of the Church.
As a result, this doctrine, beginning with the outstanding contribution
of Leo XIII and enriched by the successive contributions of the
Magisterium, has now become an updated doctrinal "corpus".
It builds up gradually, as the Church, in the fullness of the word
revealed by Christ Jesus[3] and with the assistance of the Holy
Spirit (cf. Jn 14:16, 26; 16:13-15), reads events as they unfold
in the course of history. She thus seeks to lead people to respond,
with the support also of rational reflection and of the human sciences,
to their vocation as responsible builders of earthly society.
2. Part of this large body of social teaching is the distinguished
Encyclical "Populorum Progressio"[4] which my esteemed
predecessor Paul VI published on 26 March 1967.
The enduring relevance of this Encyclical is easily recognized if
we note the series of commemorations which took place during 1987
in various forms and in many parts of the ecclesiastical and civil
world. For this same purpose, the Pontifical Commission "Iustitia
et Pax" sent a circular letter to the Synods of the Oriental
Catholic Churches and to the Episcopal Conferences, asking for ideas
and suggestions on the best way to celebrate the Encyclical's anniversary,
to enrich its teachings and, if need be, to update them. At the
time of the twentieth anniversary, the same Commission organized
a solemn commemoration in which I myself took part and gave the
concluding address.[5] And now, also taking into account the replies
to the above mentioned circular letter, I consider it appropriate,
at the close of the year 1987, to devote an Encyclical to the theme
of "Populorum Progressio".
3. In this way I wish principally to achieve two objectives of no
little importance: on the one hand, to pay homage to this historic
document of Paul VI and to its teaching; on the other hand, following
in the footsteps of my esteemed predecessors in the See of Peter,
to reaffirm the continuity of the social doctrine as well as its
constant renewal. In effect, continuity and renewal are a proof
of the perennial value of the teaching of the Church.
This twofold dimension is typical of her teaching in the social
sphere. On the one hand it is constant, for it remains identical
in its fundamental inspiration, in its "principles of reflection",
in its "criteria of judgment", in its basic "directives
for action",[6] and above all in its vital link with the Gospel
of the Lord. On the other hand, it is ever new, because it is subject
to the necessary and opportune adaptations suggested by the changes
in historical conditions and by the unceasing flow of the events
which are the setting of the life of people and society.
4. I am convinced that the teachings of the Encyclical Populorum
Progressio, addressed to the people and the society of the sixties,
retain all their force as an appeal to conscience today in the last
part of the eighties, in an effort to trace the major lines of the
present world always within the context of the aim and inspiration
of the "development of peoples", which are still very
far from being exhausted. I therefore propose to extend the impact
of that message by bringing it to bear, with its possible applications,
upon the present historical moment, which is no less dramatic than
that of twenty years ago.
As we well know, time maintains a constant and unchanging rhythm.
Today however we have the impression that it is passing ever more
quickly, especially by reason of the multiplication and complexity
of the phenomena in the midst of which we live. Consequently, the
configuration of the world in the course of the last twenty years,
while preserving certain fundamental constants, has undergone notable
changes and presents some totally new aspects.
The present period of time, on the eve of the third Christian millennium,
is characterized by a widespread expectancy, rather like a new "Advent",[7]
which to some extent touches everyone. It offers an opportunity
to study the teachings of the Encyclical in greater detail and to
see their possible future developments.
The aim of the present reflection is to emphasize, through a theological
investigation of the present world, the need for a fuller and more
nuance concept of development, according to the suggestions contained
in the Encyclical. Its aim is also to indicate some ways of putting
it into effect.
5. As soon as it appeared, the document of Pope Paul VI captured
the attention of public opinion by reason of its originality. In
a concrete manner and with great clarity, it was possible to identify
the above-mentioned characteristics of continuity and renewal within
the Church's social doctrine. The intention of rediscovering numerous
aspects of this teaching, through a careful re-reading of the Encyclical,
will therefore constitute the main thread of the present reflections.
But first I wish to say a few words about the date of publication:
the year 1967. The very fact that Pope Paul VI chose to publish
a social Encyclical in that year invites us to consider the document
in relationship to the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council, which
had ended on 8 December 1965.
6. We should see something more in this than simple chronological
proximity. The Encyclical Populorum Progressio presents itself,
in a certain way, as a document which applies the teachings of the
Council. It not only makes continual reference to the texts of the
Council,[8] but it also flows from the same concern of the Church
which inspired the whole effort of the Council--and in a particular
way the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et Spes to coordinate and
develop a number of themes of her social teaching.
We can therefore affirm that the Encyclical Populorum Progressio
is a kind of response to the Council's appeal with which the Constitution
Gaudium et Spes begins: "The joys and the hopes, the griefs
and the anxieties of the people of this age, especially those who
are poor or in any way afflicted, these too are the joys and hopes,
the griefs and anxieties of the followers of Christ. Indeed, nothing
genuinely human fails to raise an echo in their hearts".[9]
These words express the fundamental motive inspiring the great document
of the Council, which begins by noting the situation of poverty
and of under-development in which millions of human beings live.
This poverty and underdevelopment are, under another name, the "griefs
and the anxieties" of today, of "especially those who
are poor". Before this vast panorama of pain and suffering
the Council wished to suggest horizons of joy and hope. The Encyclical
of Paul VI has the same purpose, in full fidelity to the inspiration
of the Council.
7. There is also the theme of the Encyclical which, in keeping with
the great tradition of the Church's social teaching, takes up again
in a direct manner the new exposition and rich synthesis which the
Council produced, notably in the Constitution Gaudium et Spes.
With regard to the content and themes once again set forth by the
Encyclical, the following should be emphasized: the awareness of
the duty of the Church, as "an expert in humanity", "to
scrutinize the signs of the times and to interpret them in the light
of the Gospel";[10] the awareness, equally profound, of her
mission of "service", a mission distinct from the function
of the State, even when she is concerned with people's concrete
situation;[11] the reference to the notorious inequalities in the
situations of those same people;[12] the confirmation of the Council's
teaching, a faithful echo of the centuries-old tradition of the
Church, regarding the "universal purpose of goods";[13]
the appreciation of the culture and the technological civilization
which contribute to human liberation,[14] without failing to recognize
their limits;[15] finally, on the specific theme of development,
which is precisely the theme of the Encyclical, the insistence on
the "most serious duty" incumbent on the more developed
nations "to help the developing countries".[16] The same
idea of development proposed by the Encyclical flows directly from
the approach which the Pastoral Constitution takes to this problem.[17]
These and other explicit references to the Pastoral Constitution
lead one to conclude that the Encyclical presents itself as an application
of the Council's teaching in social matters to the specific problem
of the development and the underdevelopment of peoples.
8. This brief analysis helps us to appreciate better the originality
of the Encyclical, which can be stated in three points.
The first is constituted by the very fact of a document, issued
by the highest authority of the Catholic Church and addressed both
to the Church herself and "to all people of good will",[18]
on a matter which at first sight is solely economic and social:
the development of peoples. The term "development" is
taken from the vocabulary of the social and economic sciences. From
this point of view, the Encyclical Populorum Progressio follows
directly in the line of the Encyclical Rerum Novarum, which deals
with the "condition of the workers".[19] Considered superficially,
both themes could seem extraneous to the legitimate concern of the
Church seen as a religious institution and "development"
even more so than the "condition of the workers".
In continuity with the Encyclical of Leo XIII, it must be recognized
that the document of Paul VI possesses the merit of having emphasized
the ethical and cultural character of the problems connected with
development, and likewise the legitimacy and necessity of the Church's
intervention in this field.
In addition, the social doctrine of the Church has once more demonstrated
its character as an application of the word of God to people's lives
and the life of society, as well as to the earthly realities connected
with them, offering "principles for reflection", "criteria
of judgment" and "directives for action".[20] Here,
in the document of Paul VI, one finds these three elements with
a prevalently practical orientation, that is, directed towards moral
conduct.
In consequence, when the Church concerns herself with the "development
of peoples", she cannot be accused of going outside her own
specific field of competence and, still less, outside the mandate
received from the Lord.
9. The second point of originality of Populorum Progressio is shown
by the breadth of outlook open to what is commonly called the "social
question".
In fact, the Encyclical Mater et Magistra of Pope John XXIII had
already entered into this wider outlook[21] and the Council had
echoed the same in the Constitution Gaudium et Spes.[22] However,
the social teaching of the Church had not yet reached the point
of affirming with such clarity that the social question has acquired
a worldwide dimension,[23] nor had this affirmation and the accompanying
analysis yet been made into a "directive for action",
as Paul VI did in his Encyclical.
Such an explicit taking up of a position offers a great wealth of
content, which it is appropriate to point out.
In the first place a possible misunderstanding has to be eliminated.
Recognition that the "social question" has assumed a worldwide
dimension does not at all mean that it has lost its incisiveness
or its national and local importance. On the contrary, it means
that the problems in industrial enterprises or in the workers' and
union movements of a particular country or region are not to be
considered as isolated cases with no connection. On the contrary
they depend more and more on the influence of factors beyond regional
boundaries and national frontiers.
Unfortunately, from the economic point of view, the developing countries
are much more numerous than the developed ones; the multitudes of
human beings who lack the goods and services offered by development
are much more numerous than those who possess them.
We are therefore faced with a serious problem of unequal distribution
of the means of subsistence originally meant for everybody, and
thus also an unequal distribution of the benefits deriving from
them. And this happens not through the fault of the needy people,
and even less through a sort of inevitability dependent on natural
conditions or circumstances as a whole.
The Encyclical of Paul VI. in declaring that the social question
has acquired worldwide dimensions, first of all points out a moral
fact, one which has its foundation in an objective analysis of reality.
In the words of the Encyclical itself, "each one must be conscious"
of this fact,[24] precisely because it directly concerns the conscience,
which is the source of moral decisions.
In this framework, the originality of the Encyclical consists not
so much in the affirmation, historical in character, of the universality
of the social question, but rather in the moral evaluation of this
reality. Therefore political leaders, and citizens of rich countries
considered as individuals, especially if they are Christians, have
the moral obligation, according to the degree of each one's responsibility,
to take into consideration, in personal decisions and decisions
of government, this relationship of universality, this interdependence
which exists between their conduct and the poverty and underdevelopment
of so many millions of people. Pope Paul's Encyclical translates
more succinctly the moral obligation as the "duty of solidarity";[25]
and this affirmation, even though many situations have changed in
the world, has the same force and validity today as when it was
written.
On the other hand, without departing from the lines of this moral
vision, the originality of the Encyclical also consists in the basic
insight that the very concept of development, if considered in the
perspective of universal interdependence, changes notably. True
development cannot consist in the simple accumulation of wealth
and in the greater availability of goods and services, if this is
gained at the expense of the development of the masses, and without
due consideration for the social, cultural and spiritual dimensions
of the human being.[26]
10. As a third point, the Encyclical provides a very original contribution
to the social doctrine of the Church in its totality and to the
very concept of development. This originality is recognizable in
a phrase of the document's concluding paragraph and which can be
considered as its summary, as well as its historic label: "Development
is the new name for peace".[27]
In fact, if the social question has acquired a worldwide dimension,
this is because the demand for justice can only be satisfied on
that level. To ignore this demand could encourage the temptation
among the victims of injustice to respond with violence, as happens
at the origin of many wars. Peoples excluded from the fair distribution
of the goods originally destined for all could ask themselves: why
not respond with violence to those who first treat us with violence?
And if the situation is examined in the light of the division of
the world into ideological blocs--a division already existing in
1967 and in the light of the subsequent economic and political repercussions
and dependencies, the danger is seen to be much greater.
The first consideration of the striking content of the Encyclical's
historic phrase may be supplemented by a second consideration to
which the document itself alludes:[28] how can one justify the fact
that huge sums of money, which could and should be used for increasing
the development of peoples, are instead utilized for the enrichment
of individuals or groups, or assigned to the increase of stockpiles
of weapons, both in developed countries and in the developing ones,
thereby upsetting the real priorities? This is even more serious
given the difficulties which often hinder the direct transfer of
capital set aside for helping needy countries. If "development
is the new name for peace", war and military preparations are
the major enemy of the integral development of peoples.
In the light of this expression of Pope Paul VI, we are thus invited
to re-examine the concept of development. This of course is not
limited to merely satisfying material necessities through an increase
of goods, while ignoring the sufferings of the many and making the
selfishness of individuals and nations the principal motivation.
As the Letter of Saint James pointedly reminds us: "What causes
wars, and what causes fightings among you? Is it not your passions
that are at war in your members? You desire and do not have"
(Js 4:1-2).
On the contrary, in a different world, ruled by concern for the
common good of all humanity, or by concern for the "spiritual
and human development of all" instead of by the quest for individual
profit, peace would be possible as the result of a "more perfect
justice among people".[29]
Also this new element of the Encyclical has a permanent and contemporary
value, in view of the modern attitude which is so sensitive to the
close link between respect for justice and the establishment of
real peace.
11. In its own time the fundamental teaching of the Encyclical Populorum
Progressio received great acclaim for its novel character. The social
context in which we live today cannot be said to be completely identical
to that of twenty years ago. For this reason, I now wish to conduct
a brief review of some of the characteristics of today's world,
in order to develop the teaching of Paul VI's Encyclical, once again
from the point of view of the "development of peoples".
12. The first fact to note is that the hopes for development, at
that time so lively, today appear very far from being realized.
In this regard, the Encyclical had no illusions. Its language, grave
and at times dramatic, limited itself to stressing the seriousness
of the situation and to bringing before the conscience of all the
urgent obligation of contributing to its solution. In those years
there was a certain widespread optimism about the possibility of
overcoming, without excessive efforts, the economic backwardness
of the poorer peoples, of providing them with infrastructures and
assisting them in the process of industrialization.
In that historical context, over and above the efforts of each country,
the United Nations Organization promoted consecutively two decades
of development.[30] In fact, some measures, bilateral and multilateral,
were taken with the aim of helping many nations, some of which had
already been independent for some time, and others--the majority
being States just born from the process of decolonization. For her
part, the Church felt the duty to deepen her understanding of the
problems posed by the new situation, in the hope of supporting these
efforts with her religious and human inspiration, in order to give
them a "soul" and an effective impulse.
13. It cannot be said that these various religious, human, economic
and technical initiatives have been in vain, for they have succeeded
in achieving certain results. But in general, taking into account
the various factors, one cannot deny that the present situation
of the world, from the point of view of development, offers a rather
negative impression.
For this reason, I wish to call attention to a number of general
indicators, without excluding other specific ones. Without going
into an analysis of figures and statistics, it is sufficient to
face squarely the reality of an innumerable multitude of people--children,
adults and the elderly in other words, real and unique human persons,
who are suffering under the intolerable burden of poverty. There
are many millions who are deprived of hope due to the fact that,
in many parts of the world, their situation has noticeably worsened.
Before these tragedies of total indigence and need, in which so
many of our brothers and sisters are living, it is the Lord Jesus
himself who comes to question us (cf. Mt 25: 31-46).
14. The first negative observation to make is the persistence and
often the widening of the gap between the areas of the so-called
developed North and the developing South. This geographical terminology
is only indicative, since one cannot ignore the fact that the frontiers
of wealth and poverty intersect within the societies themselves,
whether developed or developing. In fact, just as social inequalities
down to the level of poverty exist in rich countries, so, in parallel
fashion, in the less developed countries one often sees manifestations
of selfishness and a flaunting of wealth which is as disconcerting
as it is scandalous.
The abundance of goods and services available in some parts of the
world, particularly in the developed North, is matched in the South
by an unacceptable delay, and it is precisely in this geopolitical
area that the major part of the human race lives.
Looking at all the various sectors--the production and distribution
of foodstuffs, hygiene, health and housing, availability of drinking
water, working conditions (especially for women), life expectancy
and other economic and social indicators the general picture is
a disappointing one, both considered in itself and in relation to
the corresponding data of the more developed countries. The word
"gap" returns spontaneously to mind.
Perhaps this is not the appropriate word for indicating the true
reality, since it could give the impression of a stationary phenomenon.
This is not the case. The pace of progress in the developed and
developing countries in recent years has differed, and this serves
to widen the distances. Thus the developing countries, especially
the poorest of them, find themselves in a situation of very serious
delay.
We must also add the differences of culture and value systems between
the various population groups, differences which do not always match
the degree of economic development, but which help to create distances.
These are elements and aspects which render the social question
much more complex, precisely because this question has assumed a
universal dimension.
As we observe the various parts of the world separated by this widening
gap, and note that each of these parts seems to follow its own path
with its own achievements, we can understand the current usage which
speaks of different worlds within our one world: the First World,
the Second World, the Third World and at times the Fourth World.[31]
Such expressions, which obviously do not claim to classify exhaustively
all countries, are significant: they are a sign of a widespread
sense that the unity of the world, that is, the unity of the human
race, is seriously compromised. Such phraseology, beyond its more
or less objective value, undoubtedly conceals a moral content, before
which the Church, which is a "sacrament or sign and instrument...
of the unity of the whole human race",[32] cannot remain indifferent.
15. However, the picture just given would be incomplete if one failed
to add to the "economic and social indices" of underdevelopment
other indices which are equally negative and indeed even more disturbing,
beginning with the cultural level. These are illiteracy, the difficulty
or impossibility of obtaining higher education, the inability to
share in the building of one's own nation, the various forms of
exploitation and of economic, social, political and even religious
oppression of the individual and his other rights, discrimination
of every type, especially the exceptionally odious form based on
difference of race. If some of these scourges are noted with regret
in areas of the more developed North, they are undoubtedly more
frequent, more lasting and more difficult to root out in the developing
and less advanced countries.
It should be noted that in today's world, among other rights, the
right of economic initiative is often suppressed. Yet it is a right
which is important not only for the individual but also for the
common good. Experience shows us that the denial of this right,
or its limitation in the name of an alleged "equality"
of everyone in society, diminishes, or in practice absolutely destroys
the spirit of initiative, that is to say the creative subjectivity
of the citizen. As a consequence, there arises, not so much a true
equality as a "leveling down". In the place of creative
initiative there appears passivity, dependence and submission to
the bureaucratic apparatus which, as the only "ordering"
and "decision-making" body if not also the "owner"
of the entire totality of goods and the means of production, puts
everyone in a position of almost absolute dependence, which is similar
to the traditional dependence of the worker-proletarian in capitalism.
This provokes a sense of frustration or desperation and predisposes
people to opt out of national life, impelling many to emigrate and
also favoring a form of "psychological" emigration.
Such a situation has its consequences also from the point of view
of the "rights of individual nations". In fact, it often
happens that a nation is deprived of its subjectivity, that is to
say the "sovereignty" which is its right, in its economic,
political-social and in a certain way cultural significance, since
in a national community all these dimensions of life are bound together.
It must also be restated that no social group, for example a political
party, has the right to usurp the role of sole leader, since this
brings about the destruction of the true subjectivity of society
and of the individual citizens, as happens in every form of totalitarianism.
In this situation the individual and the people become "objects",
in spite of all declarations to the contrary and verbal assurances.
We should add here that in today's world there are many other forms
of poverty. For are there not certain privations or deprivations
which deserve this name? The denial or the limitation of human rights
as for example the right to religious freedom, the right to share
in the building of society, the freedom to organize and to form
unions, or to take initiatives in economic matters--do these not
impoverish the human person as much as, if not more than, the deprivation
of material goods? And is development which does not take into account
the full affirmation of these rights really development on the human
level?
In brief, modern underdevelopment is not only economic but also
cultural, political and simply human, as was indicated twenty years
ago by the Encyclical Populorum Progressio. Hence at this point
we have to ask ourselves if the sad reality of today might not be,
at least in part, the result of a too narrow idea of development,
that is, a mainly economic one.
16. It should be noted that in spite of the praiseworthy efforts
made in the last two decades by the more developed or developing
nations and the International Organizations to find a way out of
the situation, or at least to remedy some of its symptoms, the conditions
have become notably worse.
Responsibility for this deterioration is due to various causes.
Notable among them are undoubtedly grave instances of omissions
on the part of the developing nations themselves, and especially
on the part of those holding economic and political power. Nor can
we pretend not to see the responsibility of the developed nations,
which have not always, at least in due measure, felt the duty to
help countries separated from the affluent world to which they themselves
belong.
Moreover, one must denounce the existence of economic, financial
and social mechanisms which, although they are manipulated by people,
often function almost automatically, thus accentuating the situation
of wealth for some and poverty for the rest. These mechanisms, which
are manoeuvred directly or indirectly by the more developed countries,
by their very functioning favor the interests of the people manipulating
them. But in the end they suffocate or condition the economies of
the less developed countries. Later on these mechanisms will have
to be subjected to a careful analysis under the ethical-moral aspect.
Populorum Progressio already foresaw the possibility that under
such systems the wealth of the rich would increase and the poverty
of the poor would remain.[33] A proof of this forecast has been
the appearance of the so-called Fourth World.
17. However much society worldwide shows signs of fragmentation,
expressed in the conventional names First, Second, Third and even
Fourth World, their interdependence remains close. When this interdependence
is separated from its ethical requirements, it has disastrous consequences
for the weakest. Indeed, as a result of a sort of internal dynamic
and under the impulse of mechanisms which can only be called perverse,
this interdependence triggers negative effects even in the rich
countries. It is precisely within these countries that one encounters,
though on a lesser scale, the more specific manifestations of underdevelopment.
Thus it should be obvious that development either becomes shared
in common by every part of the world or it undergoes a process of
regression even in zones marked by constant progress. This tells
us a great deal about the nature of authentic development: either
all the nations of the world participate, or it will not be true
development.
Among the specific signs of underdevelopment which increasingly
affect the developed countries also, there are two in particular
that reveal a tragic situation. The first is the housing crisis.
During this International Year of the Homeless proclaimed by the
United Nations, attention is focused on the millions of human beings
lacking adequate housing or with no housing at all, in order to
awaken everyone's conscience and to find a solution to this serious
problem with its negative consequences for the individual, the family
and society.[34]
The lack of housing is being experienced universally and is due
in large measure to the growing phenomenon of urbanization.[35]
Even the most highly developed peoples present the sad spectacle
of individuals and families literally struggling to survive, without
a roof over their heads or with a roof so inadequate as to constitute
no roof at all.
The lack of housing, an extremely serious problem in itself, should
be seen as a sign and summing-up of a whole series of shortcomings,
economic, social, cultural or simply human in nature. Given the
extent of the problem, we should need little convincing of how far
we are from an authentic development of peoples.
18. Another indicator common to the vast majority of nations is
the phenomenon of unemployment and underemployment.
Everyone recognizes the reality and growing seriousness of this
problem in the industrialized countries.[36] While it is alarming
in the developing countries, with their high rate of population
growth and their large numbers of young people, in the countries
of high economic development the sources of work seem to be shrinking,
and thus the opportunities for employment are decreasing rather
than increasing.
This phenomenon too, with its series of negative consequences for
individuals and for society, ranging from humiliation to the loss
of that self-respect which every man and woman should have, prompts
us to question seriously the type of development which has been
followed over the past twenty years. Here the words of the Encyclical
Laborem Exercens are extremely appropriate: "It must be stressed
that the constitutive element in this progress and also the most
adequate way to verify it in a spirit of justice and peace, which
the Church proclaims and for which she does not cease to pray...
is the continual reappraisal of man's work, both in the aspect of
its objective finality and in the aspect of the dignity of the subject
of all work, that is to say, man". On the other hand, "we
cannot fail to be struck by a disconcerting fact of immense proportions:
the fact that... there are huge numbers of people who are unemployed...
a fact that without any doubt demonstrates that both within the
individual political communities and in their relationships on the
continental and world level there is something wrong with the organization
of work and employment, precisely at the most critical and socially
most important points".[37]
This second phenomenon, like the previous one, because it is universal
in character and tends to proliferate, is a very telling negative
sign of the state and the quality of the development of peoples
which we see today.
19. A third phenomenon, likewise characteristic of the most recent
period, even though it is not met with everywhere, is without doubt
equally indicative of the interdependence between developed and
less developed countries. It is the question of the international
debt, concerning which the Pontifical Commission "Iustitia
et Pax" has issued a document.[38]
At this point one cannot ignore the close connection between a problem
of this kind the growing seriousness of which was already foreseen
in "Populorum Progressio"[39]--and the question of the
development of peoples.
The reason which prompted the developing peoples to accept the offer
of abundantly available capital was the hope of being able to invest
it in development projects. Thus the availability of capital and
the fact of accepting it as a loan can be considered a contribution
to development, something desirable and legitimate in itself, even
though perhaps imprudent and occasionally hasty.
Circumstances having changed, both within the debtor nations and
in the international financial market, the instrument chosen to
make a contribution to development has turned into a counter-productive
mechanism. This is because the debtor nations, in order to service
their debt, find themselves obliged to export the capital needed
for improving or at least maintaining their standard of living.
It is also because, for the same reason, they are unable to obtain
new and equally essential financing.
Through this mechanism, the means intended for the development of
peoples has turned into a brake upon development instead, and indeed
in some cases has even aggravated underdevelopment.
As the recent document of the Pontifical Commission "Iustitia
et Pax" states,[40] these observations should make us reflect
on the ethical character of the interdependence of peoples. And
along similar lines, they should make us reflect on the requirements
and conditions, equally inspired by ethical principles, for cooperation
in development.
20. If at this point we examine the reasons for this serious delay
in the process of development, a delay which has occurred contrary
to the indications of the Encyclical Populorum Progression, which
had raised such great hopes, our attention is especially drawn to
the political causes of today's situation.
Faced with a combination of factors which are undoubtedly complex,
we cannot hope to achieve a comprehensive analysis here. However,
we cannot ignore a striking fact about the political picture since
the Second World War, a fact which has considerable impact on the
forward movement of the development of peoples.
I am referring to the existence of two opposing blocs, commonly
known as the East and the West. The reason for this description
is not purely political but is also, as the expression goes, geopolitical.
Each of the two blocs tends to assimilate or gather around it other
countries or groups of countries, to different degrees of adherence
or participation.
The opposition is first of all political, inasmuch as each bloc
identifies itself with a system of organizing society and exercising
power which presents itself as an alternative to the other. The
political opposition, in turn, takes its origin from a deeper opposition
which is ideological in nature.
In the West there exists a system which is historically inspired
by the principles of the liberal capitalism which developed with
industrialization during the last century. In the East there exists
a system inspired by the Marxist collectivism which sprang from
an interpretation of the condition of the proletarian classes made
in the light of a particular reading of history. Each of the two
ideologies, on the basis of two very different visions of man and
of his freedom and social role, has proposed and still promotes,
on the economic level, antithetical forms of the organization of
labor and of the structures of ownership, especially with regard
to the so-called means of production. It was inevitable that by
developing antagonistic systems and centers of power, each with
its own forms of propaganda and indoctrination, the ideological
opposition should evolve into a growing military opposition and
give rise to two blocs of armed forces, each suspicious and fearful
of the other's domination.
International relations, in turn, could not fail to feel the effects
of this "logic of blocs" and of the respective "
spheres of influence". The tension between the two blocs which
began at the end of the Second World War has dominated the whole
of the subsequent forty years. Sometimes it has taken the form of
"cold war" sometimes of "wars by proxy", through
the manipulation of local conflicts, and sometimes it has kept people's
minds in suspense and anguish by the threat of an open and total
war.
Although at the present time this danger seems to have receded,
yet without completely disappearing, and even though an initial
agreement has been reached on the destruction of one type of nuclear
weapon, the existence and opposition of the blocs continue to be
a real and worrying fact which still colors the world picture.
21. This happens with particularly negative effects in the international
relations which concern the developing countries. For as we know
the tension between East and West is not in itself an opposition
between two different levels of development but rather between two
concepts of the development of individuals and peoples, both concepts
being imperfect and in need of radical correction. This opposition
is transferred to the developing countries themselves, and thus
helps to widen the gap already existing on the economic level between
North and South and which results from the distance between the
two worlds: the more developed one and the less developed one.
This is one of the reasons why the Church's social doctrine adopts
a critical attitude towards both liberal capitalism and Marxist
collectivism. For from the point of view of development the question
naturally arises: in what way and to what extent are these two systems
capable of changes and updatings such as to favor or promote a true
and integral development of individuals and peoples in modern society?
In fact, these changes and updatings are urgent and essential for
the cause of a development common to all.
Countries which have recently achieved independence, and which are
trying to establish a cultural and political identity of their own,
and need effective and impartial aid from all the richer and more
developed countries, find themselves involved in, and sometimes
overwhelmed by, ideological conflicts, which inevitably create internal
divisions, to the extent in some cases of provoking full civil war.
This is also because investments and aid for development are often
diverted from their proper purpose and used to sustain conflicts,
apart from and in opposition to the interests of the countries which
ought to benefit from them. Many of these countries are becoming
more and more aware of the danger of falling victim to a form of
neo-colonialism and are trying to escape from it. It is this awareness
which in spite of difficulties, uncertainties and at times contradictions
gave rise to the International Movement of Non-Aligned Nations,
which, in its positive aspect, would like to affirm in an effective
way the right of every people to its own identity, independence
and security, as well as the right to share, on a basis of equality
and solidarity, in the goods intended for all.
22. In the light of these considerations, we easily arrive at a
clearer picture of the last twenty years and a better understanding
of the conflicts in the northern hemisphere, namely between East
and West, as an important cause of the retardation or stagnation
of the South.
The developing countries, instead of becoming autonomous nations
concerned with their own progress towards a just sharing in the
goods and services meant for all, become parts of a machine, cogs
on a gigantic wheel. This is often true also in the field of social
communications, which, being run by centers mostly in the northern
hemisphere, do not always give due consideration to the priorities
and problems of such countries or respect their cultural make-up.
They frequently impose a distorted vision of life and of man, and
thus fail to respond to the demands of true development.
Each of the two blocs harbors in its own way a tendency towards
imperialism, as it is usually called, or towards forms of neo-colonialism:
an easy temptation to which they frequently succumb, as history,
including recent history, teaches.
It is this abnormal situation, the result of a war and of an unacceptably
exaggerated concern for security, which deadens the impulse towards
united cooperation by all for the common good of the human race,
to the detriment especially of peaceful peoples who are impeded
from their rightful access to the goods meant for all.
Seen in this way, the present division of the world is a direct
obstacle to the real transformation of the conditions of underdevelopment
in the developing and less advanced countries. However, peoples
do not always resign themselves to their fate. Furthermore, the
very needs of an economy stifled by military expenditure and by
bureaucracy and intrinsic inefficiency now seem to favor processes
which might mitigate the existing opposition and make it easier
to begin a fruitful dialogue and genuine collaboration for peace.
23. The statement in the Encyclical Populorum Progressio that the
resources and investments devoted to arms production ought to be
used to alleviate the misery of impoverished peoples[41] makes more
urgent the appeal to overcome the opposition between the two blocs.
Today, the reality is that these resources are used to enable each
of the two blocs to overtake the other and thus guarantee its own
security. Nations which historically, economically and politically
have the possibility of playing a leadership role are prevented
by this fundamentally flawed distortion from adequately fulfilling
their duty of solidarity for the benefit of peoples which aspire
to full development.
It is timely to mention and it is no exaggeration that a leadership
role among nations can only be justified by the possibility and
willingness to contribute widely and generously to the common good.
If a nation were to succumb more or less deliberately to the temptation
to close in upon itself and failed to meet the responsibilities
following from its superior position in the community of nations,
it would fall seriously short of its clear ethical duty. This is
readily apparent in the circumstances of history, where believers
discern the dispositions of Divine Providence, ready to make use
of the nations for the realization of its plans, so as to render
"vain the designs of the peoples" (cf. Ps 33 /32: 10 ).
When the West gives the impression of abandoning itself to forms
of growing and selfish isolation, and the East in its turn seems
to ignore for questionable reasons its duty to cooperate in the
task of alleviating human misery, then we are up against not only
a betrayal of humanity's legitimate expectations a betrayal that
is a harbinger of unforeseeable consequences but also a real desertion
of a moral obligation.
24. If arms production is a serious disorder in the present world
with regard to true human needs and the employment of the means
capable of satisfying those needs, the arms trade is equally to
blame. Indeed, with reference to the latter it must be added that
the moral judgment is even more severe. As we all know, this is
a trade without frontiers, capable of crossing even the barriers
of the blocs. It knows how to overcome the division between East
and West, and above all the one between North and South, to the
point--and this is more serious of pushing its way into the different
sections which make up the southern hemisphere. We are thus confronted
with a strange phenomenon: while economic aid and development plans
meet with the obstacle of insuperable ideological barriers, and
with tariff and trade barriers, arms of whatever origin circulate
with almost total freedom all over the world. And as the recent
document of the Pontifical Commission "Iustitia et Pax"
on the international debt points out,[42] everyone knows that in
certain cases the capital lent by the developed world has been used
in the underdeveloped world to buy weapons.
If to all this we add the tremendous and universally acknowledged
danger represented by atomic weapons stockpiled on an incredible
scale, the logical conclusion seems to be this: in today's world,
including the world of economics, the prevailing picture is one
destined to lead us more quickly towards death rather than one of
concern for true development which would lead all towards a "more
human" life, as envisaged by the Encyclical "Populorum
Progressio."[43]
The consequences of this state of affairs are to be seen in the
festering of a wound which typifies and reveals the imbalances and
conflicts of the modern world: the millions of refugees whom war,
natural calamities, persecution and discrimination of every kind
have deprived of home, employment, family and homeland. The tragedy
of these multitudes is reflected in the hopeless faces of men, women
and children who can no longer find a home in a divided and inhospitable
world.
Nor may we close our eyes to another painful wound in today's world:
the phenomenon of terrorism, understood as the intention to kill
people and destroy property indiscriminately, and to create a climate
of terror and insecurity, often including the taking of hostages.
Even when some ideology or the desire to create a better society
is adduced as the motivation for this inhuman behavior, acts of
terrorism are never justifiable. Even less so when, as happens today,
such decisions and such actions, which at times lead to real massacres
and to the abduction of innocent people who have nothing to do with
the conflicts, claim to have a propaganda purpose for furthering
a cause. It is still worse when they are an end in themselves, so
that murder is committed merely for the sake of killing. In the
face of such horror and suffering, the words I spoke some years
ago are still true, and I wish to repeat them again: "What
Christianity forbids is to seek solutions... by the ways of hatred,
by the murdering of defenseless people, by the methods of terrorism".[44]
25. At this point something must be said about the demographic problem
and the way it is spoken of today, following what Paul VI said in
his Encyclical[45] and what I myself stated at length in the Apostolic
Exhortation "Familiaris Consortia."[46]
One cannot deny the existence, especially in the southern hemisphere,
of a demographic problem which creates difficulties for development.
One must immediately add that in the northern hemisphere the nature
of this problem is reversed: here, the cause for concern is the
drop in the birthrate, with repercussions on the aging of the population,
unable even to renew itself biologically. In itself, this is a phenomenon
capable of hindering development. Just as it is incorrect to say
that such difficulties stem solely from demographic growth, neither
is it proved that all demographic growth is incompatible with orderly
development.
On the other hand, it is very alarming to see governments in many
countries launching systematic campaigns against birth, contrary
not only to the cultural and religious identity of the countries
themselves but also contrary to the nature of true development.
It often happens that these campaigns are the result of pressure
and financing coming from abroad, and in some cases they are made
a condition for the granting of financial and economic aid and assistance.
In any event, there is an absolute lack of respect for the freedom
of choice of the parties involved, men and women often subjected
to intolerable pressures, including economic ones, in order to force
them to submit to this new form of oppression. It is the poorest
populations which suffer such mistreatment, and this sometimes leads
to a tendency towards a form of racism, or the promotion of certain
equally racist forms of eugenics.
This fact too, which deserves the most forceful condemnation, is
a sign of an erroneous and perverse idea of true human development.
26. This mainly negative overview of the actual situation of development
in the contemporary world would be incomplete without a mention
of the coexistence of positive aspects.
The first positive note is the full awareness among large numbers
of men and women of their own dignity and of that of every human
being. This awareness is expressed, for example, in the more lively
concern that human rights should be respected, and in the more vigorous
rejection of their violation. One sign of this is the number of
recently established private associations, some worldwide in membership,
almost all of them devoted to monitoring with great care and commendable
objectivity what is happening internationally in this sensitive
field.
At this level one must acknowledge the influence exercised by the
Declaration of Human Rights, promulgated some forty years ago by
the United Nations Organization. Its very existence and gradual
acceptance by the international community are signs of a growing
awareness. The same is to be said, still in the field of human rights,
of other juridical instruments issued by the United Nations Organization
or other International Organizations.[47]
The awareness under discussion applies not only to individuals but
also to nations and peoples, which, as entities having a specific
cultural identity, are particularly sensitive to the preservation,
free exercise and promotion of their precious heritage.
At the same time, in a world divided and beset by every type of
conflict, the conviction is growing of a radical interdependence
and consequently of the need for a solidarity which will take up
interdependence and transfer it to the moral plane. Today perhaps
more than in the past, people are realizing that they are linked
together by a common destiny, which is to be constructed together,
if catastrophe for all is to be avoided. From the depth of anguish,
fear and escapist phenomena like drugs, typical of the contemporary
world, the idea is slowly emerging that the good to which we are
all called and the happiness to which we aspire cannot be obtained
without an effort and commitment on the part of all, nobody excluded,
and the consequent renouncing of personal selfishness.
Also to be mentioned here, as a sign of respect for life despite
all the temptations to destroy it by abortion and euthanasia is
a concomitant concern for peace, together with an awareness that
peace is indivisible. It is either for all or for none. It demands
an ever greater degree of rigorous respect for justice and consequently
a fair distribution of the results of true development.[48]
Among today's positive signs we must also mention a greater realization
of the limits of available resources, find of the need to respect
the integrity and the cycles of nature and to take them into account
when planning for development, rather than sacrificing them to certain
demagogic ideas about the latter. Today this is called ecological
concern.
It is also right to acknowledge the generous commitment of statesmen,
politicians, economists, trade unionists, people of science and
international officials many of them inspired by religious faith
who at no small personal sacrifice try to resolve the world's ills
and who give of themselves in every way so as to ensure that an
ever increasing number of people may enjoy the benefits of peace
and a quality of life worthy of the name.
The great International Organizations and a number of the Regional
Organizations, contribute to this in no small measure. Their united
efforts make possible more effective action.
It is also through these contributions that some Third World countries,
despite the burden of many negative factors, have succeeded in reaching
a certain self-sufficiency in food, or a degree of industrialization
which makes it possible to survive with dignity and to guarantee
sources of employment for the active population.
Thus, all is not negative in the contemporary world, nor could it
be, for the Heavenly Father's Providence lovingly watches over even
our daily cares (cf. Mt 6: 25-32; 10: 23-31; Lk 12: 6-7; 22-30).
Indeed, the positive values which we have mentioned testify to a
new moral concern, particularly with respect to the great human
problems such as development and peace.
This fact prompts me to turn my thoughts to the true nature of the
development of peoples, along the lines of the Encyclical which
we are commemorating, and as a mark of respect for its teaching.
27. The examination which the Encyclical invites us to make of the
contemporary world leads us to note in the first place that development
is not a straightforward process, as it were automatic and in itself
limitless, as though, given certain conditions, the human race were
able to progress rapidly towards an undefined perfection of some
kind.[49]
Such an idea linked to a notion of "progress" with philosophical
connotations deriving from the Enlightenment, rather than to the
notion of "development"[50] which is used in a specifically
economic and social sense now seems to be seriously called into
doubt, particularly since the tragic experience of the two world
wars, the planned and partly achieved destruction of whole peoples,
and the looming atomic peril. A naive mechanistic optimism has been
replaced by a well-founded anxiety for the fate of humanity.
28. At the same time, however, the "economic" concept
itself, linked to the word development, has entered into crisis.
In fact there is a better understanding today that the mere accumulation
of goods and services, even for the benefit of the majority, is
not enough for the realization of human happiness. Nor, in consequence,
does the availability of the many real benefits provided in recent
times by science and technology, including the computer sciences,
bring freedom from every form of slavery. On the contrary, the experience
of recent years shows that unless all the considerable body of resources
and potential at man's disposal is guided by a moral understanding
and by an orientation towards the true good of the human race, it
easily turns against man to oppress him.
A disconcerting conclusion about the most recent period should serve
to enlighten us: side-by-side with the miseries of underdevelopment,
themselves unacceptable, we find ourselves up against a form of
superdevelopment, equally inadmissible, because like the former
it is contrary to what is good and to true happiness. This superdevelopment,
which consists in an excessive availability of every kind of material
goods for the. benefit of certain social groups, easily makes people
slaves of "possession" and of immediate gratification,
with no other horizon than the multiplication or continual replacement
of the things already owned with others still better. This is the
so-called civilization of "consumption" or "consumerism",
which involves so much "throwing-away" and "waste".
An object already owned but now superseded by something better is
discarded, with no thought of its possible lasting value in itself,
nor of some other human being who is poorer.
All of us experience firsthand the sad effects of this blind submission
to pure consumerism: in the first place a crass materialism, and
at the same time a radical dissatisfaction, because one quickly
learns unless one is shielded from the flood of publicity and the
ceaseless and tempting offers of products that the more one possesses
the more one wants, while deeper aspirations remain unsatisfied
and perhaps even stifled.
The Encyclical of Pope Paul VI pointed out the difference, so often
emphasized today, between "having" and "being",[51]
which had been expressed earlier in precise words by the Second
Vatican Council.[52] To "have" objects and goods does
not in itself perfect the human subject, unless it contributes to
the maturing and enrichment of that subject's "being",
that is to say unless it contributes to the realization of the human
vocation as such.
Of course, the difference between "being" and "having",
the danger inherent in a mere multiplication or replacement of things
possessed compared to the value of "being", need not turn
into a contradiction. One of the greatest injustices in the contemporary
world consists precisely in this: that the ones who possess much
are relatively few and those who possess almost nothing are many.
It is the injustice of the poor distribution of the goods and services
originally intended for all.
This then is the picture: there are some people the few who possess
much who do not really succeed in "being" because, through
a reversal of the hierarchy of values, they are hindered by the
cult of "having"; and there are others the many who have
little or nothing--who do not succeed in realizing their basic human
vocation because they are deprived of essential goods.
The evil does not consist in "having" as such, but in
possessing without regard for the quality and the ordered hierarchy
of the goods one has. Quality and hierarchy arise from the subordination
of goods and their availability to man's "being" and his
true vocation.
This shows that although development has a necessary economic dimension,
since it must supply the greatest possible number of the world's
inhabitants with an availability of goods essential for them "to
be", it is not limited to that dimension. If it is limited
to this, then it turns against those whom it is meant to benefit.
The characteristics of full development, one which is "more
human" and able to sustain itself at the level of the true
vocation of men and women without denying economic requirements,
were described by Paul VI.[53]
29. Development which is not only economic must be measured and
oriented according to the reality and vocation of man seen in his
totality, namely, according to his interior dimension. There is
no doubt that he needs created goods and the products of industry,
which is constantly being enriched by scientific and technological
progress. And the ever greater availability of material goods not
only meets needs but also opens new horizons. The danger of the
misuse of material goods and the appearance of artificial needs
should in no way hinder the regard we have for the new goods and
resources placed at our disposal and the use we make of them. On
the contrary, we must see them as a gift from God and as a response
to the human vocation, which is fully realized in Christ.
However, in trying to achieve true development we must never lose
sight of that dimension which is in the specific nature of man,
who has been created by God in his image and likeness (cf. Gen 1:26).
It is a bodily and a spiritual nature, symbolized in the second
creation account by the two elements: the earth, from which God
forms man's body, and the breath of life which he breathes into
man's nostrils (cf. Gen 2:7).
Thus man comes to have a certain affinity with other creatures:
he is called to use them, and to be involved with them. As the Genesis
account says (cf. Gen 2:15), he is placed in the garden with the
duty of cultivating and watching over it, being superior to the
other creatures placed by God under his dominion (cf. Gen 1:2526).
But at the same time man must remain subject to the will of God,
who imposes limits upon his use and dominion over things (cf. Gen
2:16-17), just as he promises him immortality (cf. Gen 2:9; Wis
2:23). Thus man, being the image of God, has a true affinity with
him too.
On the basis of this teaching, development cannot consist only in
the use, dominion over and indiscriminate possession of created
things and the products of human industry, but rather in subordinating
the possession, dominion and use to man's divine likeness and to
his vocation to immortality. This is the transcendent reality of
the human being, a reality which is seen to be shared from the beginning
by a couple, a man and a woman (cf. Gen 1: 27), and is therefore
fundamentally social.
30. According to Sacred Scripture therefore, the notion of development
is not only "lay" or "profane", but is also
seen to be, while having a socioeconomic dimension of its own, the
modern expression of an essential dimension of man's vocation.
The fact is that man was not created, so to speak, immobile and
static. The first portrayal of him, as given in the Bible, certainly
presents him as a creature and image, defined in his deepest reality
by the origin and affinity that constitute him. But all this plants
within the human being man and woman the seed and the requirement
of a special task to be accomplished by each individually and by
them as a couple. The task is "to have dominion" over
the other created beings, "to cultivate the garden". This
is to be accomplished within the framework of obedience to the divine
law and therefore with respect for the image received, the image
which is the clear foundation of the power of dominion recognized
as belonging to man as the means to his perfection (cf. Gen 1:26-30;
2:15-16; Wis 9:2-3).
When man disobeys God and refuses to submit to his rule, nature
rebels against him and no longer recognizes him as its "master",
for he has tarnished the divine image in himself. The claim to ownership
and use of created things remains still valid, but after sin its
exercise becomes difficult and full of suffering (cf. Gen 3: 17-19).
In fact, the following chapter of Genesis shows us that the descendants
of Cain build "a city", engage in sheep farming, practice
the arts (music) and technical skills (metallurgy); while at the
same time people began to "call upon the name of the Lord"
(cf. Gen 4:17-26).
The story of the human race described by Sacred Scripture is, even
after the fall into sin, a story of constant achievements, which,
although always called into question and threatened by sin, are
nonetheless repeated, increased and extended in response to the
divine vocation given from the beginning to man and to woman (cf.
Gen 1: 26-28) and inscribed in the image which they received.
It is logical to conclude, at least on the part of those who believe
in the word of God, that today's "development" is to be
seen as a moment in the story which began at creation, a story which
is constantly endangered by reason of infidelity to the Creator's
will, and especially by the temptation to idolatry. But this "development"
fundamentally corresponds to the first premises. Anyone wishing
to renounce the difficult yet noble task of improving the lot of
man in his totality, and of all people, with the excuse that the
struggle is difficult and that constant effort is required, or simply
because of the experience of defeat and the need to begin again,
that person would be betraying the will of God the Creator. In this
regard, in the Encyclical Laborem Exercens I referred to man's vocation
to work, in order to emphasize the idea that it is always man who
is the protagonist of development.[54]
Indeed, the Lord Jesus himself, in the parable of the talents, emphasizes
the severe treatment given to the man who dared to hide the gift
received: "You wicked and slothful servant! You knew that I
reap where I have not sowed and gather where I have not winnowed?
... So take the talent from him, and give it to him who has the
ten talents" (Mt 25: 26-28). It falls to us, who receive the
gifts of God in order to make them fruitful, to "sow"
and "reap". If we do not, even what we have will be taken
away from us.
A deeper study of these harsh words will make us commit ourselves
more resolutely to the duty, which is urgent for everyone today,
to work together for the full development of others: "development
of the whole human being and of all people".[55]
31. Faith in Christ the Redeemer, while it illuminates from within
the nature of development, also guides us in the task of collaboration.
In the Letter of Saint Paul to the Colossians, we read that Christ
is "the firstborn of all creation", and that "all
things were created through him" and for him (1:15-16). In
fact, "all things hold together in him", since "in
him all the fullness of God was pleased to dwell, and through him
to reconcile to himself all things (v. 20).
A part of this divine plan, which begins from eternity in Christ,
the perfect "image" of the Father, and which culminates
in him, "the firstborn from the dead" (v. 18), is our
own history, marked by our personal and collective effort to raise
up the human condition and to overcome the obstacles which are continually
arising along our way. It thus prepares us to share in the fullness
which "dwells in the Lord" and which he communicates "to
his body, which is the Church" (v. 18; cf. Eph 1:22-23). At
the same time sin, which is always attempting to trap us and which
jeopardizes our human achievements, is conquered and redeemed by
the "reconciliation" accomplished by Christ (cf. Col.
1: 20).
Here the perspectives widen. The dream of "unlimited progress"
reappears, radically transformed by the new outlook created by Christian
faith, assuring us that progress is possible only because God the
Father has decided from the beginning to make man a sharer of his
glory in Jesus Christ risen from the dead, in whom "we have
redemption through his blood... the forgiveness of our trespasses"
(Eph 1: 7). In him God wished to conquer sin and make it serve our
greater good,[56] which infinitely surpasses what progress could
achieve.
We can say therefore as we struggle amidst the obscurities and deficiencies
of underdevelopment and superdevelopment that one day this corruptible
body will put on incorruptibility, this mortal body immortality
(cf. 1 Cor 15:54), when the Lord "delivers the Kingdom to God
the Father" (v. 24) and all the works and actions that are
worthy of man will be redeemed.
Furthermore, the concept of faith makes quite clear the reasons
which impel the Church to concern herself with the problems of development,
to consider them a duty of her pastoral ministry, and to urge all
to think about the nature and characteristics of authentic human
development. Through her commitment she desires, on the one hand,
to place herself at the service of the divine plan which is meant
to order all things to the fullness which dwells in Christ (cf.
Col 1:19) and which he communicated to his body; and on the other
hand she desires to respond to her fundamental vocation of being
a "sacrament", that is to say "a sign and instrument
of intimate union with God and of the unity of the whole human race".[57]
Some Fathers of the Church were inspired by this idea to develop
in original ways a concept of the meaning of history and of human
work, directed towards a goal which surpasses this meaning and which
is always defined by its relationship to the work of Christ. In
other words, one can find in the teaching of the Fathers an optimistic
vision of history and work, that is to say of the perennial value
of authentic human achievements, inasmuch as they are redeemed by
Christ and destined for the promised Kingdom.[58]
Thus, part of the teaching and most ancient practice of the Church
is her conviction that she is obliged by her vocation she herself,
her ministers and each of her members to relieve the misery of the
suffering, both far and near, not only out of her "abundance"
but also out of her "necessities". Faced by cases of need,
one cannot ignore them in favor of superfluous church ornaments
and costly furnishings for divine worship; on the contrary it could
be obligatory to sell these goods in order to provide food, drink,
clothing and shelter for those who lack these things.[59] As has
been already noted, here we are shown a "hierarchy of values"--in
the framework of the right to property between "having"
and "being", especially when the "having" of
a few can be to the detriment of the "being" of many others.
In his Encyclical Pope Paul VI stands in the line of this teaching,
taking his inspiration from the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium et
Spes.[60] For my own part, I wish to insist once more on the seriousness
and urgency of that teaching, and I ask the Lord to give all Christians
the strength to put it faithfully into practice.
32. The obligation to commit oneself to the development of peoples
is not just an individual duty, and still less an individualistic
one, as if it were possible to achieve this development through
the isolated efforts of each individual. It is an imperative which
obliges each and every man and woman, as well as societies and nations.
In particular, it obliges the Catholic Church and the other Churches
and Ecclesial Communities, with which we are completely willing
to collaborate in this field. In this sense, just as we Catholics
invite our Christian brethren to share in our initiatives, so too
we declare that we are ready to collaborate in theirs, and we welcome
the invitations presented to us. In this pursuit of integral human
development we can also do much with the members of other religions,
as in fact is being done in various places.
Collaboration in the development of the whole person and of every
human being is in fact a duty of all towards all, and must be shared
by the four parts of the world: East and West, North and South;
or, as we say today, by the different "worlds". If, on
the contrary, people try to achieve it in only one part, or in only
one world, they do so at the expense of the others; and, precisely
because the others are ignored, their own development becomes exaggerated
and misdirected.
Peoples or nations too have a right to their own full development,
which while including as already said the economic and social aspects
should also include individual cultural identity and openness to
the transcendent. Not even the need for development can be used
as an excuse for imposing on others one's own way of life or own
religious belief.
33. Nor would a type of development which did not respect and promote
human rights personal and social, economic and political, including
the rights of nations and of peoples be really worthy of man.
Today, perhaps more than in the past, the intrinsic contradiction
of a development limited only to its economic element is seen more
clearly. Such development easily subjects the human person and his
deepest needs to the demands of economic planning and selfish profit.
The intrinsic connection between authentic development and respect
for human rights once again reveals the moral character of development:
the true elevation of man, in conformity with the natural and historical
vocation of each individual, is not attained only by exploiting
the abundance of goods and services, or by having available perfect
infrastructures.
When individuals and communities do not see a rigorous respect for
the moral, cultural and spiritual requirements, based on the dignity
of the person and on the proper identity of each community, beginning
with the family and religious societies, then all the rest availability
of goods, abundance of technical resources applied to daily life,
a certain level of material well-being will prove unsatisfying and
in the end contemptible. The Lord clearly says this in the Gospel,
when he calls the attention of all to the true hierarchy of values:
"For what will it profit a man, if he gains the whole world
and forfeits his life?" (Mt 16:26).
True development, in keeping with the specific needs of the human
being man or woman, child, adult or old person implies, especially
for those who actively share in this process and are responsible
for it, a lively awareness of the value of the rights of all and
of each person. It likewise implies a lively awareness of the need
to respect the right of every individual to the full use of the
benefits offered by science and technology.
On the internal level of every nation, respect for all rights takes
on great importance, especially: the right to life at every stage
of its existence; the rights of the family, as the basic social
community, or "cell of society"; justice in employment
relationships; the rights inherent in the life of the political
community as such; the rights based on the transcendent vocation
of the human being, beginning with the right of freedom to profess
and practice one's own religious belief.
On the international level, that is, the level of relations between
States or, in present-day usage, between the different "worlds",
there must be complete respect for the identity of each people,
with its own historical and cultural characteristics. It is likewise
essential, as the Encyclical Populorum Progressio already asked,
to recognize each people's equal right "to be seated at the
table of the common banquet",[61] instead of lying outside
the door like Lazarus, while "the dogs come and lick his sores"
(cf. Lk 16:21). Both peoples and individuals must enjoy the fundamental
equality[62] which is the basis, for example, of the Charter of
the United Nations Organization: the equality which is the basis
of the right of all to share in the process of full development.
In order to be genuine, development must be achieved within the
framework of solidarity and freedom, without ever sacrificing either
of them under whatever pretext. The moral character of development
and its necessary promotion are emphasized when the most rigorous
respect is given to all the demands deriving from the order of truth
and good proper to the human person. Furthermore the Christian who
is taught to see that man is the image of God, called to share in
the truth and the good which is God himself, does not understand
a commitment to development and its application which excludes regard
and respect for the unique dignity of this "image". In
other words, true development must be based on the love of God and
neighbor, and must help to promote the relationships between individuals
and society. This is the "civilization of love" of which
Paul VI often spoke.
34. Nor can the moral character of development exclude respect for
the beings which constitute the natural world, which the ancient
Greeks alluding precisely to the order which distinguishes it--called
the "cosmos". Such realities also demand respect, by virtue
of a threefold consideration which it is useful to reflect upon
carefully.
The first consideration is the appropriateness of acquiring a growing
awareness of the fact that one cannot use with impunity the different
categories of beings, whether living or inanimate, animals, plants,
the natural elements simply as one wishes, according to one's own
economic needs. On the contrary, one must take into account the
nature of each being and of its mutual connection in an ordered
system, which is precisely the "cosmos".
The second consideration is based on the realization which is perhaps
more urgent that natural resources are limited; some are not, as
it is said, renewable. Using them as if they were inexhaustible,
with absolute dominion, seriously endangers their availability not
only for the present generation but above all for generations to
come.
The third consideration refers directly to the consequences of a
certain type of development on the quality of life in the industrialized
zones. We all know that the direct or indirect result of industrialization
is, ever more frequently, the pollution of the environment, with
serious consequences for the health of the population.
Once again it is evident that development, the planning which governs
it, and the way in which resources are used must include respect
for moral demands. One of the latter undoubtedly imposes limits
on the use of the natural world. The dominion granted to man by
the Creator is not an absolute power, nor can one speak of a freedom
to "use and misuse", or to dispose of things as one pleases.
The limitation imposed from the beginning by the Creator himself
and expressed symbolically by the prohibition not to "eat of
the fruit of the tree" (cf. Gen 2:16-17) shows clearly enough
that, when it comes to the natural world, we are subject not only
to biological laws but also to moral ones, which cannot be violated
with impunity.
A true concept of development cannot ignore the use of the elements
of nature, the renewability of resources and the consequences of
haphazard industrialization three considerations which alert our
consciences to the moral dimension of development.[63]
35. Precisely because of the essentially moral character of development,
it is clear that the obstacles to development likewise have a moral
character. If in the years since the publication of Pope Paul's
Encyclical there has been no development or very little, irregular,
or even contradictory development the reasons are not only economic.
As has already been said, political motives also enter in. For the
decisions which either accelerate or slows down the development
of peoples are really political in character. In order to overcome
the misguided mechanisms mentioned earlier and to replace them with
new ones which will be more just and in conformity with the common
good of humanity, an effective political will is needed. Unfortunately,
after analyzing the situation we have to conclude that this political
will has been insufficient.
In a document of a pastoral nature such as this, an analysis limited
exclusively to the economic and political causes of underdevelopment
(and, mutatis mutandis, of so-called super-development) would be
incomplete. It is therefore necessary to single out the moral causes
which, with respect to the behavior of individuals considered as
responsible persons, interfere in such a way as to slow down the
course of development and hinder its full achievement.
Similarly, when the scientific and technical resources are available
which, with the necessary concrete political decisions, ought to
help lead peoples to true development, the main obstacles to development
will be overcome only by means of essentially moral decisions. For
believers, and especially for Christians, these decisions will take
their inspiration from the principles of faith, with the help of
divine grace.
36. It is important to note therefore that a world which is divided
unto blocs, sustained by rigid ideologies, and in which instead
of interdependence and solidarity different forms of imperialism
hold sway, can only be a world subject to structures of sin. The
sum total of the negative factors working against a true awareness
of the universal common good, and the need to further it, gives
the impression of creating, in persons and institutions, an obstacle
which is difficult to overcome.[64]
If the present situation can be attributed to difficulties of various
kinds, it is not out of place to speak of "structures of sin",
which, as I stated in my Apostolic Exhortation Reconciliatio et
Paenitentia, are rooted in personal sin, and thus always linked
to the concrete acts of individuals who introduce these structures,
consolidate them and make them difficult to remove.[65] And thus
they grow stronger, spread, and become the source of other sins,
and so influence people's behavior.
"Sin" and "structures of sin" are categories
which are seldom applied to the situation of the contemporary world.
However, one cannot easily gain a profound understanding of the
reality that confronts us unless we give a name to the root of the
evils which afflict us.
One can certainly speak of "selfishness" and of "shortsightedness",
of "mistaken political calculations" and "imprudent
economic decisions". And in each of these evaluations one hears
an echo of an ethical and moral nature. Man's condition is such
that a more profound analysis of individuals' actions and omissions
cannot be achieved without implying, in one way or another, judgments
or references of an ethical nature.
This evaluation is in itself positive, especially if it is completely
consistent and if it is based on faith in God and on his law, which
commands what is good and forbids evil.
In this consists the difference between socio-political analysis
and formal reference to "sin" and the "structures
of sin". According to this latter viewpoint, there enter in
the will of the Triune God, his plan for humanity, his justice and
his mercy. The God who is rich in mercy, the Redeemer of man, the
Lord and giver of life, requires from people clear-cut attitudes
which express themselves also in actions or omissions towards one's
neighbor. We have here a reference to the "second tablet"
of the Ten Commandments (cf. Ex 20:12-17; Dt 5: 16-21). Not to observe
these is to offend God and hurt one's neighbor, and to introduce
into the world influences and obstacles which go far beyond the
actions and the brief lifespan of an individual. This also involves
interference in the process of the development of peoples, the delay
or slowness of which must be judged also in this light.
37. This general analysis, which is religious in nature, can be
supplemented by a number of particular considerations to demonstrate
that among the actions and attitudes opposed to the will of God,
the good of neighbor and the "structures" created by them,
two are very typical: on the one hand, the all-consuming desire
for profit, and on the other, the thirst for power, with the intention
of imposing one's will upon others. In order to characterize better
each of these attitudes, one can add the expression: "at any
price". In other words, we are faced with the absolutizing
of human attitudes with all its possible consequences.
Since these attitudes can exist independently of each other, they
can be separated; however in today's world both are indissolubly
united, with one or the other predominating.
Obviously, not only individuals fall victim to this double attitude
of sin; nations and blocs can do so too. And this favors even more
the introduction of the "structures of sin" of which I
have spoken. If certain forms of modern "imperialism"
were considered in the light of these moral criteria, we would see
that hidden behind certain decisions, apparently inspired only by
economics or politics, are real forms of idolatry: of money, ideology,
class, technology.
I have wished to introduce this type of analysis above all in order
to point out the true nature of the evil which faces us with respect
to the development of peoples: it is a question of a moral evil,
the fruit of many sins which lead to "structures of sin".
To diagnose the evil in this way is to identify precisely, on the
level of human conduct, the path to be followed in order to overcome
it.
38. This path is long and complex, and what is more it is constantly
threatened because of the intrinsic frailty of human resolutions
and achievements, and because of the mutability of very unpredictable
external circumstances. Nevertheless, one must have the courage
to set out on this path, and, where some steps have been taken or
a part of the journey made, the courage to go on to the end.
In the context of these reflections the decision to set out or to
continue the journey involves, above all, a moral value which men
and women of faith recognize as a demand of God's will, the only
true foundation of an absolutely binding ethic.
One would hope that also men and women without an explicit faith
would be convinced that the obstacles to integral development are
not only economic but rest on more profound attitudes which human
beings can make into absolute values. Thus one would hope that all
those who, to some degree or other, are responsible for ensuring
a "more human life" for their fellow human beings, whether
or not they are inspired by a religious faith, will become fully
aware of the urgent need to change the spiritual attitudes which
define each individual's relationship with self, with neighbor,
with even the remotest human communities, and with nature itself;
and all of this in view of higher values such as the common good
or, to quote the felicitous expression of the Encyclical Populorum
Progressio, the full development "of the whole individual and
of all people."[66]
For Christians, as for all who recognize the precise theological
meaning of the word "sin", a change of behavior or mentality
or mode of existence is called "conversion", to use the
language of the Bible (cf. Mk 13:3, 5; Is 30:15). This conversion
specifically entails a relationship to God, and to the sin committed,
to its consequences and hence to one's neighbor, either an individual
or a community. It is God, in "whose hands are the hearts of
the powerful"[67] and the hearts of all, who according to his
own promise and by the power of his Spirit can transform "hearts
of stone" into "hearts of flesh" (cf. Ezek 36:26).
On the path towards the desired conversion, towards the overcoming
of the moral obstacles to development, it is already possible to
point to the positive and moral value of the growing awareness of
interdependence among individuals and nations. The fact that men
and women in various parts of the world feel personally affected
by the injustices and violations of human rights committed in distant
countries, countries which perhaps they will never visit, is a further
sign of a reality transformed into awareness, thus acquiring a moral
connotation.
It is above all a question of interdependence, sensed as a system
determining relationships in the contemporary world, in its economic,
cultural, political and religious elements, and accepted as a moral
category. When interdependence becomes recognized in this way, the
correlative response as a moral and social attitude, as a "virtue",
is solidarity. This then is not a feeling of vague compassion or
shallow distress at the misfortunes of so many people, both near
and far. On the contrary, it is a firm and persevering determination
to commit oneself to the common good; that is to say to the good
of all and of each individual, because we are all really responsible
for all. This determination is based on the solid conviction that
what is hindering full development is that desire for profit and
that thirst for power already mentioned. These attitudes and "structures
of sin" are only conquered--presupposing the help of divine
grace--by a diametrically opposed attitude: a commitment to the
good of one's neighbor with the readiness, in the Gospel sense,
to "lose oneself" for the sake of the other instead of
exploiting him, and to "serve him" instead of oppressing
him for one's own advantage (cf. Mt 10:40-42; 20: 25; Mk 10: 42-45;
Lk 22: 25-27).
39. The exercise of solidarity within each society is valid when
its members recognize one another as persons. Those who are more
influential, because they have a greater share of goods and common
services, should feel responsible for the weaker and be ready to
share with them all they possess. Those who are weaker, for their
part, in the same spirit of solidarity, should not adopt a purely
passive attitude or one that is destructive of the social fabric,
but, while claiming their legitimate rights, should do what they
can for the good of all. The intermediate groups, in their turn,
should not selfishly insist on their particular interests, but respect
the interests of others.
Positive signs in the contemporary world are the growing awareness
of the solidarity of the poor among themselves, their efforts to
support one another, and their public demonstrations on the social
scene which, without recourse to violence, present their own needs
and rights in the face of the inefficiency or corruption of the
public authorities. By virtue of her own evangelical duty the Church
feels called to take her stand beside the poor, to discern the justice
of their requests, and to help satisfy them, without losing sight
of the good of groups in the context of the common good.
The same criterion is applied by analogy in international relationships.
Interdependence must be transformed into solidarity, based upon
the principle that the goods of creation are meant for all. That
which human industry produces through the processing of raw materials,
with the contribution of work, must serve equally for the good of
all.
Surmounting every type of imperialism and determination to preserve
their own hegemony, the stronger and richer nations must have a
sense of moral responsibility for the other nations, so that a real
international system may be established which will rest on the foundation
of the equality of all peoples and on the necessary respect for
their legitimate differences. The economically weaker countries,
or those still at subsistence level, must be enabled, with the assistance
of other peoples and of the international community, to make a contribution
of their own to the common good with their treasures of humanity
and culture, which otherwise would be lost for ever.
Solidarity helps us to see the "other" whether a person,
people or nation not just as some kind of instrument, with a work
capacity and physical strength to be exploited at low cost and then
discarded when no longer useful, but as our "neighbor",
a "helper" (cf. Gen 2: 18-20), to be made a sharer, on
a par with ourselves, in the banquet of life to which all are equally
invited by God. Hence the importance of reawakening the religious
awareness of individuals and peoples.
Thus the exploitation, oppression and annihilation of others are
excluded. These facts, in the present division of the world into
opposing blocs, combine to produce the danger of war and an excessive
preoccupation with personal security, often to the detriment of
the autonomy, freedom of decision, and even the territorial integrity
of the weaker nations situated within the so-called "areas
of influence" or "safety belts".
The "structures of sin" and the sins which they produce
are likewise radically opposed to peace and development, for development,
in the familiar expression of Pope Paul's Encyclical, is "the
new name for peace".[68]
In this way, the solidarity which we propose is the path to peace
and at the same time to development. For world peace is inconceivable
unless the world's leaders come to recognize that interdependence
in itself demands the abandonment of the politics of blocs, the
sacrifice of all forms of economic, military or political imperialism,
and the transformation of mutual distrust into collaboration. This
is precisely the act proper to solidarity among individuals and
nations.
The motto of the pontificate of my esteemed predecessor Pius XII
was Opus iustitiae pax, peace as the fruit of justice. Today one
could say, with the same exactness and the same power of biblical
inspiration (cf. Is 32:17; Jas 3:18): Opus solidaritatis pax, peace
as the fruit of solidarity.
The goal of peace, so desired by everyone, will certainly be achieved
through the putting into effect of social and international justice,
but also through the practice of the virtues which favor togetherness,
and which teach us to live in unity, so as to build in unity, by
giving and receiving, a new society and a better world.
40. Solidarity is undoubtedly a Christian virtue. In what has been
said so far it has been possible to identify many points of contact
between solidarity and charity, which is the distinguishing mark
of Christ's disciples (cf. Jn 13: 35)
In the light of faith, solidarity seeks to go beyond itself, to
take on the specifically Christian dimensions of total gratuity,
forgiveness and reconciliation. One's neighbor is then not only
a human being with his or her own rights and a fundamental equality
with everyone else, but becomes the living image of God the Father,
redeemed by the blood of Jesus Christ and placed under the permanent
action of the Holy Spirit. One's neighbor must therefore be loved,
even if an enemy, with the same love with which the Lord loves him
or her; and for that person's sake one must be ready for sacrifice,
even the ultimate one: to lay down one's life for the brethren (cf.
1 Jn 3: 16).
At that point, awareness of the common fatherhood of God, of the
brotherhood of all in Christ "children in the Son" and
of the presence and life-giving action of the Holy Spirit will bring
to our vision of the world a new criterion for interpreting it.
Beyond human and natural bonds, already so close and strong, there
is discerned in the light of faith a new model of the unity of the
human race, which must ultimately inspire our solidarity. This supreme
model of unity, which is a reflection of the intimate life of God,
one God in three persons, is
what we Christians mean by the word "communion". This
specifically Christian communion, jealously preserved, extended
and enriched with the Lord's help, is the soul of the Church's vocation
to be a "sacrament", in the sense already indicated.
Solidarity therefore must play its part in the realization of this
divine plan, both on the level of individuals and on the level of
national and international society. The "evil mechanisms"
and "structures of sin" of which we have spoken can be
overcome only through the exercise of the human and Christian solidarity
to which the Church calls us and which she tirelessly promotes.
Only in this way can such positive energies be fully released for
the benefit of development and peace.
Many of the Church's canonized saints offer a wonderful witness
of such solidarity and can serve as examples in the present difficult
circumstances. Among them I wish to recall Saint Peter Claver and
his service to the slaves at Cartagena de Indias, and Saint Maximilian
Maria Kolbe who offered his life in place of a prisoner unknown
to him in the concentration camp at Auschwitz.
41. The Church does not have technical solutions to offer for the
problem of underdevelopment as such, as Pope Paul VI already affirmed
in his Encyclical.[69] For the Church does not propose economic
and political systems or programs, nor does she show preference
for one or the other, provided that human dignity is properly respected
and promoted, and provided she herself is allowed the room she needs
to exercise her ministry in the world.
But the Church is an "expert in humanity",[70] and this
leads her necessarily to extend her religious mission to the various
fields in which men and women expend their efforts in search of
the always relative happiness which is possible in this world, in
line with their dignity as persons.
Following the example of my predecessors, I must repeat that whatever
affects the dignity of individuals and peoples, such as authentic
development, cannot be reduced to a "technical" problem.
If reduced in this way, development would be emptied of its true
content, and this would be an act of betrayal of the individuals
and peoples whom development is meant to serve.
This is why the Church has something to say today, just as twenty
years ago, and also in the future, about the nature, conditions,
requirements and aims of authentic development, and also about the
obstacles which stand in its way. In doing so the Church fulfills
her mission to evangelize, for she offers her first contribution
to the solution of the urgent problem of development when she proclaims
the truth about Christ, about herself and about man, applying this
truth to a concrete situation.[71]
As her instrument for reaching this goal, the Church uses her social
doctrine. In today's difficult situation, a more exact awareness
and a wider diffusion of the "set of principles for reflection,
criteria for judgment and directives for action" proposed by
the Church's teaching[72] would be of great help in promoting both
the correct definition of the problems being faced and the best
solution to them.
It will thus be seen at once that the questions neither the analysis
of the problem of development as such nor the means to overcome
the present difficulties can ignore this essential dimension.
The Church's social doctrine is not a "third way" between
liberal capitalism and Marxist collectivism, nor even a possible
alternative to other solutions less radically opposed to one another:
rather, it constitutes a category of its own. Nor is it an ideology,
but rather the accurate formulation of the results of a careful
reflection on the complex realities of human existence, in society
and in the international order, in the light of faith and of the
Church's tradition. Its main aim is to interpret these realities,
determining their conformity with or divergence from the lines of
the Gospel teaching on man and his vocation, a vocation which is
at once earthly and transcendent; its aim is thus to guide Christian
behavior. It therefore belongs to the field, not of ideology, but
of theology and particularly of moral theology.
The teaching and spreading of her social doctrine are part of the
Church's evangelizing mission. And since it is a doctrine aimed
at guiding people's behavior, it consequently gives rise to a "commitment
to justice", according to each individual's role, vocation
and circumstances.
The condemnation of evils and injustices is also part of that ministry
of evangelization in the social field which is an aspect of the
Church's prophetic role. But it should be made clear that proclamation
is always more important than condemnation, and the latter cannot
ignore the former, which gives it true solidity and the force of
higher motivation.
42. Today more than in the past, the Church's social doctrine must
be open to an international outlook, in line with the Second Vatican
Council,[73] the most recent Encyclicals,[74] and particularly in
line with the Encyclical which we are commemorating.[75] It will
not be superfluous therefore to re-examine and further clarify in
this light the characteristic themes and guidelines dealt with by
the Magisterium in recent years.
Here I would like to indicate one of them: the option or love of
preference for the poor. This is an option, or a special form of
primacy in the exercise of Christian charity, to which the whole
tradition of the Church bears witness. It affects the life of each
Christian inasmuch as he or she seeks to imitate the life of Christ,
but it applies equally to our social responsibilities and hence
to our manner of living, and to the logical decisions to be made
concerning the ownership and use of goods.
Today, furthermore, given the worldwide dimension which the social
question has assumed,[76] this love of the preference for the poor,
and the decisions which it inspires in us, cannot but embrace the
immense multitudes of the hungry, the needy, the homeless, those
without medical care and, above all, those without hope of a better
future. It is impossible not to take account of the existence of
these realities. To ignore them would mean becoming like the "rich
man" who pretended not to know the beggar Lazarus lying it
his gate (cf. Lk 16:19-31).[77]
Our daily life as well as our decisions in the political and economic
fields must be marked by these realities. Likewise the leaders of
nations and the heads of International Bodies, while they are obliged
always to keep in mind the true human dimension as a priority in
their development plans, should not forget to give precedence to
the phenomenon of growing poverty. Unfortunately, instead of becoming
fewer the poor are becoming more numerous, not only in less developed
countries but--and this seems no less scandalous--in the more developed
ones too. It is necessary to state once more the characteristic
principle of Christian social doctrine: the goods of this world
are originally meant for all.[78] The right to private property
is valid and necessary, but it does not nullify the value of this
principle. Private property, in fact, is under a "social mortgage",[79]
which means that it has an intrinsically social function, based
upon and justified precisely by the principle of the universal destination
of goods. Likewise, in this concern for the poor, one must not overlook
that special form of poverty which consists in being deprived of
fundamental human rights, in particular the right to religious freedom
and also the right to freedom of economic initiative.
43. The motivating concern for the poor--who are, in the very meaningful
term, "the Lord's poor"[80]--must be translated at all
levels into concrete actions, until it decisively attains a series
of necessary reforms. will show what reforms are most urgent and
how they can be achieved. But those demanded by the situation of
international imbalance, as already described, must not be forgotten.
In this respect I wish to mention specifically: the reform of the
international trade system, which is mortgaged to protectionism
and increasing bilateralism; the reform of the world monetary and
financial system, today recognized as inadequate; the question of
technological exchanges and their proper use; the need for a review
of the structure of the existing International Organizations, in
the framework of an international juridical order.
The international trade system today frequently discriminates against
the products of the young industries of the developing countries
and discourages the producers of raw materials. There exists, too,
a kind of international division of labor, whereby the low-cost
products of certain countries which lack effective labor laws or
which are too weak to apply them are sold in other parts of the
world at considerable profit for the companies engaged in this form
of production, which knows no frontiers.
The world monetary and financial system is marked by an excessive
fluctuation of exchange rates and interest rates, to the detriment
of the balance of payments and the debt situation of the poorer
countries.
Forms of technology and their transfer constitute today one of the
major problems of international exchange and of the grave damage
deriving therefrom. There are quite frequent cases of developing
countries being denied needed forms of technology or sent useless
ones.
In the opinion of many, the International Organizations seem to
be at a stage of their existence when their operating methods, operating
costs and effectiveness need careful review and possible correction.
Obviously, such a delicate process cannot be put into effect without
the collaboration of all. This presupposes the overcoming of political
rivalries and the renouncing of all desire to manipulate these Organizations,
which exist solely for the common good.
The existing Institutions and Organizations have worked well for
the benefit of peoples. Nevertheless, humanity today is in a new
and more difficult phase of its genuine development. It needs a
greater degree of international ordering, at the service of the
societies, economies and cultures of the whole world.
44. Development demands above all a spirit of initiative on the
part of the countries which need it.[81] Each of them must act in
accordance with its own responsibilities, not expecting everything
from the more favored countries, and acting in collaboration with
others in the same situation. Each must discover and use to the
best advantage its own area of freedom. Each must make itself capable
of initiatives responding to its own needs as a society. Each must
likewise realize its true needs as well as the rights and duties
which oblige it to respond to them. The development of peoples begins
and is most appropriately accomplished in the dedication of each
people to its own development, in collaboration with others.
It is important then that as far as possible the developing nations
themselves should favor the self-affirmation of each citizen, through
access to a wider culture and a free flow of information. Whatever
promotes literacy and the basic education which completes and deepens
it is a direct contribution to true development, as the Encyclical
Populorum Progressio proposed.[82] These goals are still far from
being reached in so many parts of the world.
In order to take this path, the nations themselves will have to
identify their own priorities and clearly recognize their own needs,
according to the particular conditions of their people, their geographical
settling and their cultural traditions.
Some nations will have to increase food production, in order to
have always available what is needed for subsistence and daily life.
In the modern world where starvation claims so many victims, especially
among the very young there are examples of not particularly developed
nations which have nevertheless achieved the goal of food self-sufficiency
and have even become food exporters.
Other nations need to reform certain unjust structures, and in particular
their political institutions, in order to replace corrupt, dictatorial
and authoritarian forms of government by democratic and participatory
ones. This is a process which we hope will spread and grow stronger.
For the "health" of a political community as expressed
in the free and responsible participation of all citizens in public
affairs, in the rule of law and in respect for and promotion of
human rights is the necessary condition and sure guarantee of the
development of "the whole individual and of all people".
45. None of what has been said can be achieved without the collaboration
of all especially the international community in the framework of
a solidarity which includes everyone, beginning with the most neglected.
But the developing nations themselves have the duty to practice
solidarity among themselves and with the neediest countries of the
world.
It is desirable, for example, that nations of the same geographical
area should establish forms of cooperation which will make them
less dependent on more powerful producers; they should open their
frontiers to the products of the area; they should examine how their
products might complement one another; they should combine in order
to set up those services which each one separately is incapable
of providing; they should extend cooperation to the monetary and
financial sector.
Interdependence is already a reality in many of these countries.
To acknowledge it, in such a way as to make it more operative, represents
an alternative to excessive dependence on richer and more powerful
nations, as part of the hoped for development, without opposing
anyone, but discovering and making best use of the country's own
potential. The developing countries belonging to one geographical
area, especially those included in the term "South", can
and ought to set up new regional organizations inspired by criteria
of equality, freedom and participation in the comity of nations
as is already happening with promising results.
An essential condition for global solidarity is autonomy and free
self-determination, also within associations such as those indicated.
But at the same time solidarity demands a readiness to accept the
sacrifices necessary for the good of the whole world community.
46. Peoples and individuals aspire to be free: their search for
full development signals their desire to overcome the many obstacles
preventing them from enjoying a "more human life".
Recently, in the period following the publication of the Encyclical
Populorum Progressio, a new way of confronting the problems of poverty
and underdevelopment has spread in some areas of the world, especially
in Latin America. This approach makes liberation the fundamental
category and the first principle of action. The positive values,
as well as the deviations and risks of deviation, which are damaging
to the faith and are connected with this form of theological reflection
and method, have been appropriately pointed out by the Church's
Magisterium.[83]
It is fitting to add that the aspiration to freedom from all forms
of slavery affecting the individual and society is something noble
and legitimate. This in fact is the purpose of development, or rather
liberation and development, taking into account the intimate connection
between the two.
Development which is merely economic is incapable of setting man
free; on the contrary, it will end by enslaving him further. Development
that does not include the cultural, transcendent and religious dimensions
of man and society, to the extent that it does not recognize the
existence of such dimensions and does not endeavor to direct its
goals and priorities towards the same, is even less conducive to
authentic liberation. Human beings are totally free only when they
are completely themselves, in the fullness of their rights and duties.
The same can be said about society as a whole.
The principal obstacle to be overcome on the way to authentic liberation
is sin and the structures produced by sin as it multiplies and spreads.[84]
The freedom with which Christ has set us free (cf. Gal 5:1) encourages
us to become the servants of all. Thus the process of development
and liberation takes concrete shape in the exercise of solidarity,
that is to say in the love and service of neighbor, especially of
the poorest: "For where truth and love are missing, the process
of liberation results in the death of a freedom which will have
lost all support".[85]
47. In the context of the sad experiences of recent years and of
the mainly negative picture of the present moment, the Church must
strongly affirm the possibility of overcoming the obstacles which,
by excess or by defect, stand in the way of development. And she
must affirm her confidence in a true liberation. Ultimately, this
confidence and this possibility are based on the Church's awareness
of the divine promise guaranteeing that our present history does
not remain closed in upon itself but is open to the Kingdom of God.
The Church has confidence also in man, though she knows the evil
of which he is capable. For she well knows that in spite of the
heritage of sin, and the sin which each one is capable of committing
there exist in the human person sufficient qualities and energies,
a fundamental "goodness" (cf. Gen 1:31), because he is
the image of the creator, placed under the redemptive influence
of Christ, who "united himself in some fashion with every man",[86]
and because the efficacious "fills the earth" (Wis 1:7).
There is no justification then for despair or pessimism or inertia.
Though it be with sorrow, it must be said that just as one may sin
through selfishness and the desire for excessive profit and power,
one may also be found wanting with regard to the urgent needs of
multitudes of human beings submerged in conditions of underdevelopment,
through fear, indecision and, basically, through cowardice. We are
all called, indeed obliged, to face the tremendous challenge of
the last decade of the second Millennium, also because the present
dangers threaten everyone: a world economic crisis, a war without
frontiers, without winners or losers. In the face of such a threat,
the distinction between rich individuals and countries and poor
individuals and countries will have little value, except that a
greater responsibility rests on those who have more and can do more.
This is not however the sole motive or even the most important one.
At stake is the dignity of the human person, whose defense and promotion
have been entrusted to us by the Creator, and to whom the men and
women at every moment of history are strictly and responsibly in
debt. As many people are already more or less clearly aware, the
present situation does not seem to correspond to this dignity. Every
individual is called upon to play his or her part in this peaceful
campaign, a campaign to be conducted by peaceful means, in order
to secure development in peace, in order to safeguard nature itself
and the world about us. The Church too feels profoundly involved
in this enterprise, and she hopes for its ultimate success.
Consequently, following the example of Pope Paul VI with his Encyclical
Populorum Progressio,[87] I wish to appeal with simplicity and humility
to everyone, to all men and women without exception. I wish to ask
them to be convinced of the seriousness of the present moment and
of each one's individual responsibility, and to implement by the
way they live as individuals and as families, by the use of their
resources, by their civic activity, by contributing to economic
and political decisions and by personal commitment to national and
international undertakings--the measures inspired by solidarity
and love of preference for the poor. This is what is demanded by
the present moment and above all by the very dignity of the human
person, the indestructible image of God the Creator, which is identical
in each one of us.
In this commitment, the sons and daughters of the Church must serve
as examples and guides, for they are called upon, in conformity
with the program announced by Jesus himself in the synagogue at
Nazareth, to "preach good news to the poor... to proclaim release
to the captives and recovering of sight to the blind, to set at
liberty those who are oppressed, to proclaim the acceptable year
of the Lord" (Lk 4:18-19). It is appropriate to emphasize the
preeminent role that belongs to the laity, both men and women, as
was reaffirmed in the recent Assembly of the Synod. It is their
task to animate temporal realities with Christian commitment, by
which they show that they are witnesses and agents of peace and
justice.
I wish to address especially those who, through the Sacrament of
Baptism and the profession of the same Creed, share a real, though
imperfect, communion with us. I am certain that the concern expressed
in this Encyclical as well as the motives inspiring it will be familiar
to them, for these motives are inspired by the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
We can find here a new invitation to bear witness together to our
common convictions concerning the dignity of man, created by God,
redeemed by Christ, made holy by the Spirit and called upon in this
world to live a life in conformity with this dignity.
I likewise address this appeal to the Jewish people, who share with
us the inheritance of Abraham, "our father in faith" (cf.
Rm 4:11 f.)[88] and the tradition of the Old Testament, as well
as to the Muslims who, like us, believe in the just and merciful
God. And I extend it to all the followers of the world's great religions.
The meeting held on 27 October last in Assisi, the city of Saint
Francis, in order to pray for and commit ourselves to peace---each
one in fidelity to his own religious profession showed how much
peace and, as its necessary condition, the development of the whole
person and of all peoples, are also a matter of religion, and how
the full achievement of both the one and the other depends on our
fidelity to our vocation as men and women of faith. For it depends,
above all, on God.
48. The Church well knows that no temporal achievement is to be
identified with the Kingdom of God, but that all such achievements
simply reflect and in a sense anticipate the glory of the Kingdom,
the Kingdom which we await at the end of history, when the Lord
will come again. But that expectation can never be an excuse for
lack of concern for people in their concrete personal situations
and in their social, national and international life, since the
former is conditioned by the latter, especially today.
However imperfect and temporary are all the things that can and
ought to be done through the combined efforts of everyone and through
divine grace, at a given moment of history, in order to make people's
lives "more human", nothing will be lost or will have
been in vain. This is the teaching of the Second Vatican Council,
in an enlightening passage of the Pastoral Constitution Gaudium
et Spes: "When we have spread on earth the fruits of our nature
and our enterprise human dignity, fraternal communion, and freedom
according to the command of the Lord and in his Spirit, we will
end them once again, cleansed this time from the stain of sin, illumined
and transfigured, when Christ presents to his Father an eternal
and universal kingdom... here on earth that kingdom is already present
in mystery".[89]
The Kingdom of God becomes present above all in the celebration
of the Sacrament of the Eucharist, which is the Lord's Sacrifice.
In that celebration the fruits of the earth and the work of human
hands the bread and wine are transformed mysteriously, but really
and substantially, through the power of the Holy Spirit and the
words of the minister, into the Body and Blood of the Lord Jesus
Christ, the Son of God and Son of Mary, through whom the Kingdom
of the Father has been made present in our midst.
The goods of this world and the work of our hands the bread and
wine serve for the coming of the definitive Kingdom, since the Lord,
through his Spirit, takes them up into himself in order to offer
himself to the Father and to offer us with himself in the renewal
of his one Sacrifice, which anticipates God's Kingdom and proclaims
its final coming.
Thus the Lord unites us with himself through the Eucharist Sacrament
and Sacrifice and he unites us with himself and with one another
by a bond stronger than any natural union; and thus united, he sends
us into the whole world to bear witness, through faith and works,
to God's love, preparing the coming of his Kingdom and anticipating
it, though in the obscurity of the present time.
All of us who take part in the Eucharist are called to discover,
through this Sacrament, the profound meaning of our actions in the
world in favor of development and peace; and to receive from it
the strength to commit ourselves ever more generously, following
the example of Christ, who in this Sacrament lays down his life
for his friends (cf. Jn 15:13). Our personal commitment, like Christ's
and in union with his, will not be in vain but certainly fruitful.
49. I have called the current Marian Year in order that the Catholic
faithful may look more and more to Mary who goes before us on the
pilgrimage of faith[90] and with maternal care intercedes for us
before her Son, our Redeemer. I wish to entrust to her and to her
intercession this difficult moment of the modern world, and the
efforts that are being made and will be made, often with great suffering,
in order to contribute to the true development of peoples proclaimed
by my predecessor Paul VI.
In keeping with Christian piety through the ages, we present to
the Blessed Virgin difficult individual situations, so that she
may place them before her Son, asking that he alleviate and change
them. But we also present to her social situations and the international
crisis itself, in their worrying aspects of poverty, unemployment,
shortage of food, the arms race, contempt for human rights, and
situations or dangers of conflict, partial or total. In a filial
spirit we wish to place all this before her "eyes of mercy",
repeating once more with faith and hope the ancient antiphon: "Holy
Mother of God, despise not our petitions in our necessities, but
deliver us always from all dangers, O glorious and blessed Virgin".
Mary most holy, our Mother and Queen, is the one who turns to her
Son and says: "They have no more wine" (Jn 2:3). She is
also the one who praises God the Father, because "he has put
down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of low degree;
he has filled the hungry with good things, and the rich he has sent
empty away (Lk 1:52-53). Her maternal concern extends to the personal
and social aspects of people's life on earth.[91]
Before the Most Blessed Trinity, I entrust to Mary all that I have
written in this Encyclical, and I invite all to reflect and actively
commit themselves to promoting the true development of peoples,
as the prayer of the Mass for this intention states so well: "Father,
you have given all peoples one common origin, and your will is to
gather them as one family in yourself. Fill the hearts of all with
the fire of your love, and the desire to ensure justice for all
their brothers and sisters. By sharing the good things you give
us may we secure justice and equality for every human being, an
end to all division and a human society built on love and peace".[92]
This, in conclusion, is what I ask in the name of all my brothers
and sisters, to whom I send a special blessing as a sign of greeting
and good wishes.
Given in Rome, at Saint Peter's, on 30 December of the year 1987,
the tenth of my Pontificate.
ENDNOTES
1. LEO XIII, Encyclical "Rerum Novarum" (15 May 1891):
Leonis XIII P.M. Acta, XI, Romae 1892, pp. 97-144.
2. PIUS XI, Encyclical "Quadragesimo Anno" (15 May 1931):
AAS 23 (1931), pp. 177-228; JOHN XXIII, Encyclical "Mater et
Magistra" (15 May 1961): AAS 53 (1961), pp. 401-464; Paul VI,
Apostolic Letter "Octogesima Adveniens" (14 May 1971):
AAS 63 (1971), pp. 401-441; JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical "Laborem
Exercens" (14 September 1981): AAS 73 (1981), pp. 577-647.
Also PIUS XII delivered a radio message (1 June 1941) for the fiftieth
anniversary of the Encyclical of Leo XIII: AAS 33 (1941), pp. 195-205.
3. C. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution on
Divine Revelation "Dei Verbum," 4.
4. PAUL VI, Encyclical "Populorum Progressio" (26 March
1967): AAS 59 (1967), pp. 257-299.
5. Cf. "L'Osservatore Romano," 25 May 1987.
6. Cf. CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction on
Christian Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia"
(22 March 1986), 72: AAS 79 (1987), p. 586; PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter
"Octogesima Adveniens" (14 May 1971), AAS 63 (1971), pp.
403f.
7. Cf. Encyclical "Redemptoris Mater" (25 March 1987),
3: AAS 79 (1987), pp. 363f.; Homily at the Mass of 1 January 1987:
"L'Osservatore Romano," 2 January 1987.
8. The Encyclical "Populorum Progressio" cites the documents
of the Second Vatican Ecumenical Council nineteen times, and sixteen
of the references are the Pastoral Constitution on the Church in
the Modern World "Gaudium et Spes."
9. "Gaudium et Spes," 1.
10. Ibid., 4; cf. "Populorum Progressio" 13: loc. cit.,
p. 263, 264.
11. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 3; "Populorum Progressio,"
13: loc. cit., p. 264.
12. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 63; "Populorum Progressio,"
9: loc. cit., p. 269.
13. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 69; "Populorum Progressio,"
22: loc. cit., p. 269.
14. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 57; "Populorum Progressio,"
41: loc. cit., p. 277.
15. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 19; "Populorum Progressio,"
22: loc. cit., pp. 277f.
16. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 86; "Populorum Progressio,"
48: loc. cit., p. 281.
17. Cf. "Gaudium et Spes," 69; "Populorum Progressio,"
14-21: loc. cit., pp. 264-268.
18. Cf. The Inscriptio of the Encyclical "Populorum Progressio":
loc. cit., p. 257.
19. The Encyclical "Rerum Novarum" of Leo XIII has as
its principal subject "the condition of the workers":
Leonis XIII P.M. Acta, XI, Romae 1892, p. 97.
20. Cf. CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction
on Christian Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia"
(22 March 1986), 72: AAS 79 (1987), p. 586; PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter
"Octogesima Adveniens" (14 May 1971), 4: AAS 63 (1971),
pp. 403f.
21. Cf. Encyclical "Mater et Magistra" (15 May 1961):
AAS 53 (1961), p. 440.
22. "Gaudium et Spes," 63.
23. Cf. Encyclical "Populorum Progressio," 3: loc. cit.,
p. 258; cf. also ibid., 9: loc. cit., p. 261.
24. Cf. ibid., 3: loc. cit., p. 258.
25. Ibid., 48: loc. cit., p. 281.
26. Cf. ibid., 14: loc. cit., p. 264: "Development cannot be
limited to mere economic growth. In order to be authentic, it must
be complete: integral, that is, it has to promote the good of every
man and of the whole man".
27. Ibid., 87: loc. cit., p. 299.
28. Cf. ibid., 53: loc. cit., p. 283.
29. Cf. Ibid., 76: loc. cit., p. 295.
30. The decades referred to are the years 1960-1970 and 1970-1980;
the present decade is the third (1980-1990).
31. The expression "Fourth World" is used not just occasionally
for the so-called less advanced countries, but also and especially
for the bands of great or extreme poverty in countries of medium
and high income.
32. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution on
the Church "Lumen Gentium," 1.
33. Encyclical "Populorum Progressio," 33: loc. cit.,
p. 273.
34. It should be noted that the Holy See associated itself with
the celebration of this International Year with a special Document
issued by the Pontifical Commission "Iustitia et Pax"
entitled "What Have You Done to Your Homeless Brother?"
- The Church and the Housing Problem (27 December 1987),
35. Cf. PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter "Octogesima Adveniens"
(14 May 1971), 8-9: AAS 63 (1971), pp. 406-408.
36. A recent United Nations publication entitled World Economic
Survey 1987 provides the most recent data (cf. pp. 8-9). The percentage
of unemployed in the developed countries with a market economy jumped
from 3% of the work force in 1970 to 8% in 1986. It now amounts
to 29 million people.
37. Encyclical Letter "Laborem Exercens" (14 September
1981), 18: AAS 73 (1981), pp. 624-625.
38. At the Service of the Human Community: An Ethical Approach to
the International Debt Question (27 December 1986).
39. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio", 54: loc.
cit., pp. 283f: "Developing countries will thus no longer risk
being overwhelmed by debts whose repayment swallows up the greater
part of their gains. Rates of interest and time for repayment of
the loan could be so arranged as not to be too great a a burden
on either party, taking into account free gifts, interest-free or
low-interest loans, and the time needed for liquidating the debts".
40. Cf. "Presentation" of the document At the Service
of the Human Community: An Ethical Approach to the International
Debt Question (27 December 1986),
41. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 53;
loc. cit., p. 283.
42. At the Service of the Human Community: An Ethical Approach to
the International Debt Question (27 December 1986), III, 2, 1.
43. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 20-21:
loc. cit., pp. 267f.
44. Address at Drogheda, Ireland (29 September 1979), 5: AAS 71
(1979), II, p. 1079.
45. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 37:
loc. cit., pp. 275ff.
46. Cf. Apostolic Exhortation "Familiaris Consortio" (22
November 1981), especially in 30: AAS 74 (1982), pp. 115-117.
47. Cf. Human Rights. Collection of International Instruments, United
Nations, New York 1983; John Paul II, Encyclical Letter "Redemptor
Hominis" (4 March 1979), 17: AAS 71 (1979), p. 296.
48. Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution
on the Church in the Modern World "Gaudium et Spes," 78;
PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 76:
loc. cit., pp. 294f.: "To wage war on misery and to struggle
against injustice is to promote, along with improved conditions,
the human and spiritual progress of all men, and therefore the common
good of humanity ... peace is something that is built up day after
day, in the pursuit of an order intended by God, which implies a
more perfect form of justice among men".
49. Cf. Apostolic Exhortation "Familiaris Consortio" (22
November 1981), 6: AAS 74 (1982), p. 88: "...history is not
simply a fixed progression towards what is better, but rather an
event of freedom, and even a struggle between freedoms..."
50. For this reason the word "development" was used in
the Encyclical rather than the word "progress", but with
an attempt to give the word "development" its fullest
meaning.
51. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 19, loc.
cit., pp. 266f.: "Increased possession is not the ultimate
goal of nations or of individuals. All growth is ambivalent... The
exclusive pursuit of possessions thus becomes an obstacle to individual
fulfilment and to man's true greatness... both for nations and for
individual men, avarice is the most evident form of moral underdevelopment";
cf. also PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter "Octogesima Adveniens"
(14 May 1971), 9: AAS 63 (1971), pp. 407f.
52. Cf. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World
"Gaudium et Spes", 35: PAUL VI, Address to the Diplomatic
Corps (7 January 1965): AAS 57 (1965), p. 232.
53. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 20-21:
loc. cit., pp. 267f.
54. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Laborem Exercens" (14 September
1981), 4: AAS 73 (1981), pp. 584f.; PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter "Populorum
Progressio," 15: loc. cit., p. 265.
55. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 42: loc.
cit., p. 278.
56. Cf. Praeconium Paschale, "Missale Romanum," ed. typ.
altera, 1975, p. 272: "O certe necessarium Adae peccatum, quod
Christi morte deletum est! O felix culpa, quae talem ac tantum meriut
habere Redemptorem!".
57. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution on
the Church "Lumen Gentium," 1.
58. Cf. for example, St. Basil the Great, "Regulae fusius tractatae,
interrogatio XXXVII," 1-2: PG 31, 1009-1012; Theodoret of Cyr,
"De Providentia, Oratio VII": PG 83, 665-686; St. Augustine,
"De Civitate Dei, XIX", 17: CCL 48, 683-685.
59. Cf. for example. St. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM, "In Evang. S. Matthaei,"
hom. 50, 3-4: PG 58, 508-510; St. Ambrose, "De Officiis Ministrorum,"
lib. II, XXVIII, 136-140: PL 16, 139-141; St. Possidius, "Vita
S. Augustini Episcopi," XXIV: PL 32, 53f.
60. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 23: loc.
cit., p. 268: "'If someone who has the riches of this world
sees his brother in need and closes his heart to him, how does the
love of God abide in him?' (1 Jn 3:17). It is well known how strong
were the words used by the Fathers of the Church to describe the
proper attitude of persons who possess anything towards persons
in need". In the previous number, the Pope had cited No. 69
of the Pastoral Constitution "Gaudium et Spes" of the
Second Vatican Ecumenical Council.
61. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 47:
"...a world where freedom is not an empty word and where the
poor man Lazarus can sit down at the same table with the rich man".
62. Cf. ibid., 47: "It is a question, rather, of building a
world where every man, no matter what his race, religion or nationality,
can live a fully human life, freed from servitude imposed on him
by other men..."; cf. also SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL,
Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World "Gaudium
et Spes," 29. Such fundamental equality is one of the basic
reasons why the Church has always been opposed to every form of
racism.
63. Cf. Homily at Val Visdende (12 July 1987, 5: "L'Osservatore
Romano," 13-14 July 1987; PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter "Octogesima
Adveniens" (14 May 1971), 21: AAS 63 (1971), pp. 416f.
64. Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution
on the Church in the Modern World, "Gaudium et Spes,"
25.
65. Apostolic Exhortation "Reconciliatio et Paenitentia"
(2 December 1984), 16: "Whenever the Church speaks of situations
of sin, or when she condemns as social sins certain situations or
the collective behavior of certain social groups, big or small,
or even of whole nations and blocs of nations, she knows and she
proclaims that such cases of social sin are the result of the accumulation
and concentration of many personal sins. It is a case of the very
personal sins of those who cause or support evil or who exploit
it; of those who are in a position to avoid, eliminate or at least
limit certain social evils but who fail to do so out of laziness,
fear or the conspiracy of silence, through secret complicity or
indifference; of those who take refuge in the supposed impossibility
of changing the world, and also of those who sidestep the effort
and sacrifice required, producing specious reasons of a higher order.
The real responsibility, then, lies with individuals. A situation--or
likewise an institution, a structure, society itself--is not in
itself the subject of moral acts. Hence a situation cannot in itself
be good or bad": AAS 77 (1985), p. 217.
66. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 42: loc.
cit., p. 278.
67. Cf. "Liturgia Horarum, Feria III Hebdomadae III ae Temporis
per annum," Preces ad Vesperas.
68. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 87: loc.
cit., p. 299.
69. Cf. ibid., 13; 81: loc. cit., pp. 263f.; 296f.
70. Cf. ibid., 13: loc. cit., p. 263.
71. Cf. Address at the Opening of the Third General Conference of
the Latin American Bishops ( 28 January 1979): AAS 71 (1979), pp.
189-196.
72. CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction on Christian
Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia" (22 March
1986), 72: AAS 79 (1987) p. 586; PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter "Octogesima
Adveniens" (14 May 1971), 4: AAS 63 (1971) pp. 403f.
73. Cf. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World
"Gaudium et Spes," Part II, Ch. V, Section 2: "Building
up the International Community", 83-90.
74. Cf. JOHN XXXIII, Encyclical Letter "Mater et Magistra"
(15 May 1961): AAS 53 (1961), p. 440; Encyclical Letter "Pacem
in Terri"s (11 April 1963), Part IV: AAS 55 (1963) pp. 291-296;
PAUL VI, Apostolic Letter "Octogesima Adveniens" (14 May
1971), 2-4: AAS 63 (1971), pp. 402-404.
75. Cf. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 3; 9:
loc. cit., pp. 258; 261.
76. Ibid., 3: loc. cit., p. 258.
77. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 47: loc.
cit., p. 280; CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction
on Christian Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia"
(22 March 1986), 68: AAS 79 (1987) pp. 583f.
78. Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Pastoral Constitution
on the Church in the Modern World "Gaudium et Spes," 69,
PAUL VI, Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 22:
loc. cit., p. 268; CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction
on Christian Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia"
(22 March 1986), 90: AAS 79 (1987), p. 594; ST. THOMAS AQUINAS,
"Summa Theol." IIa IIae, q. 66, art. 2.
79. Cf. Address at the Opening of the Third General Conference of
the Latin American Bishops (28 January 1979): AAS 71 (1979), pp.
189-196; "Ad limina" Address to a group of Polish Bishops,
(17 December 1987), 6: "L'Osservatore Romano," 18 December
1987.
80. Because the Lord wished to identify himself with them (Mt 25:31-46)
and takes special care of them (cf. Ps 12 [11]: 6; Lk 1:52f.).
81. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 55: loc.
cit., p. 284: "these are the men and women that need to be
helped, that need to be convinced to take into their own hands their
development, gradually acquiring the means"; cf. Pastoral Constitution
on the Church in the Modern World "Gaudium et Spes," 86.
82. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 35: loc.
cit., p. 274: "Basic education is the first objective of a
plan of development".
83. Cf. CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction
on Certain Aspects of the "Theology of Liberation" "Libertatis
Conscientia" (6 August 1984), Introduction: AAS 76 (1984),
pp. 876f.
84. Cf. Apostolic Exhortation "Reconciliatio et Paenitentia"
(2 December 1984), 16: AAS 77 (1985), pp. 213-217; CONGREGATION
FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction on Christian Freedom
and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia" (22 March 1986),
38; 42: AAS 79 (1987), pp. 569; 571.
85. CONGREGATION FOR THE DOCTRINE OF THE FAITH, Instruction on Christian
Freedom and Liberation "Libertatis Conscientia" (22 March
1986), 24: AAS 79 (1987), p. 564.
86. Cf. Pastoral Constitution on the Church in the Modern World
"Gaudium et Spes", 22; JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical Letter
"Redemptor Hominis" (4 March 1979), 8: AAS 71 (1979),
p. 272.
87. Encyclical Letter "Populorum Progressio," 5: loc.
cit., p. 259: "We believe that all men of good will, together
with our Catholic sons and daughters and our Christian brethren,
can and should agree on this programme"; cf. also 81-83, 87:
loc. cit., pp. 296-298; 299.
88. Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Declaration on the Relationship
of the Church to Non-Christian Religions, "Nostra Aetate,"
4.
89. Gaudium et Spes, 39.
90. Cf. SECOND VATICAN ECUMENICAL COUNCIL, Dogmatic Constitution
on the Church "Lumen Gentium," 58; JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical
Letter "Redemptoris Mater" (25 March 1987), 5-6: AAS 79
(1987), pp. 365-367.
91. Cf. PAUL VI, Apostolic Exhortation "Marialis Cultus"
(2 February 1974), 37: AAS 66 (1974), pp. 148f.; JOHN PAUL II, Homily
at the Shrine of the Our Lady of Zapopan, Mexico (30 January 1979),
4: AAS 71 (1979), p. 230.
92. Collect of the Mass "For the Development of Peoples":
"Missale Romanum," ed. typ. altera, 1975, p. 820.
Untitled Document
|