![]() |
||||
I have come that you may have life and have it to the full. - John 10: 10 |
||||
OCTOGESIMO
ADVENIENS: A Call to Action
|
||||
Calls for political action for economic justice. Develops the role of individual Christians and local church responding to unjust situations. |
|
Issues1. Flagrant inequalities exist in the economic, cultural and political development of nations. 2. The modern economy creates new problems: rapid urbanization, unfairness in the exchange of goods and the division of wealth, increased consumption needs and unshared responsibility. 3. Every social ideology contains possible ambiguities, actual socio-economic conditions vary widely. 4. People today seek a greater share in responsibility and decisionmaking. 5. By an ill-considered exploitation of nature man [sic] risks destroying it and creating an environment which may well be intolerable. |
Responses1. Political activity for a democratic society is consistent with the total vocation of humankind; humans can no longer rely only on economic activity. Establish an international division of production and restructure exchanges that control profits. 2. Allow each country to promote its own development and to share responsibility for decisionmaking. Political power is the natrual and necessary link for ensuring the cohesion of the social body. Its aim must be the achievement of the common good. 3. Analyze objectively the situation of one's society, apply Catholic social principles, identify action for justice. 4. Accept responsibility for one's share in injustice and for conversion; infuse one's culture with Christian principles, innovate structures to meet real needs, act politically for change. 5. The christian must turn to these new perceptions in order to take on responsibility, together with the reso of men [sic], for a destiny which from now on is shared by all. |
Venerable Brother,
1. The eightieth anniversary of the publication of the encyclical
<Rerum Novarum>, the message of which continues to inspire
action for social justice, prompts us to take up again and to
extend the teaching of our predecessors, in response to the new
needs of a changing world. The Church, in fact, travels forward
with humanity and shares its lot in the setting of history. At
the same time that she announces to men the Good News of God's
love and of salvation in Christ she clarifies their activity in
the light of the Gospel and in this way helps them to correspond
to God's plan of love and to realize the fullness of their aspirations.
2. It is with confidence that we see the Spirit of the Lord pursuing
his work in the hearts of men and in every place gathering together
Christian communities conscious of their responsibilities in society.
On all the continents, among all races, nations and cultures,
and under all conditions the Lord continues to raise up authentic
apostles of the Gospel.
We have had the opportunity to meet these people, to admire them
and to give them our encouragement in the course of our recent
journeys. We have gone into the crowds and have heard their appeals,
cries of distress and at the same time cries of hope. Under these
circumstances we have seen in a new perspective the grave problems
of our time. These problems of course are particular to each part
of the world, but at the same time they are common to all mankind,
which is questioning itself about its future and about the tendency
and the meaning of the changes taking place. Flagrant inequalities
exist in the economic, cultural and political development of the
nations: while some regions are heavily industrialized, others
are still at the agricultural stage; while some countries enjoy
prosperity, others are struggling against starvation; while some
peoples have a high standard of culture, others are still engaged
in eliminating illiteracy. From all sides there rises a yearning
for more justice and a desire for a better guaranteed peace in
mutual respect among individuals and peoples.
3. There is of course a wide diversity among the situations in
which Christians—willingly or unwillingly—find themselves
according to regions, socio-political systems and cultures. In
some places they are reduced to silence, regarded with suspicion
and as it were kept on the fringe of society, enclosed without
freedom in a totalitarian system. In other places they are a weak
minority whose voice makes itself heard with difficulty. In some
other nations, where the Church sees her place recognized, sometimes
officially so, she too finds herself subjected to the repercussions
of the crisis which is unsettling society, some of her members
are tempted by radical and violent solutions from which they believe
that they can expect a happier outcome. While some people, unaware
of present injustices, strive to prolong the existing situations,
others allow themselves to be beguiled by revolutionary ideologies
which promise them, not without delusion, a definitively better
world.
4. In the face of such widely varying situations it is difficult
for us to utter a unified message and to put forward a solution
which has universal validity. Such is not our ambition, nor is
it our mission. It is up to the Christian communities to analyze
with objectivity the situation which is proper to their own country,
to shed on it the light of the Gospel's unalterable words and
for action from the social teaching) of the Church. This social
teaching has been worked out in the course of history and notably,
in this industrial era, since the historic date of the message
of Pope Leo XIII on "the condition of the workers",
and it is an honor and joy for us to celebrate today the anniversary
of that message. It is up to these Christian communities, with
the help of the Holy Spirit, in communion with the bishops who
hold responsibility and in dialogue with other Christian brethren
and all men of goodwill, to discern the options and commitments
which are called for in order to bring about the social, political
and economic changes seen in many cases to be urgently needed.
In this search for the changes which should be promoted, Christians
must first of all renew their confidence in the forcefulness and
special character of the demands made by the Gospel. The Gospel
is not out-of-date because it was proclaimed, written and lived
in a different socio-cultural context. Its inspiration, enriched
by the living experience of Christian tradition over the centuries,
remains ever new for converting men: end for advancing the life
of society. It is not however to be utilized for the profit of
particular temporal options, to the neglect of its universal and
eternal message (1).
5. Amid the disturbances and uncertainties of the present hour,
the Church has a specific message to proclaim and a support to
give to men in their efforts to take in hand and give direction
to their future. Since the period in which the encyclical <Rerum
Novarum> denounced in a forceful and imperative manner the
scandal of the condition of the workers in the nascent industrial
society, historical evolution has led to an awareness of other
dimensions and other applications of social justice. The encyclicals
<Quadragesimo Anno> (2) and <Mater et Magistra> (3)
already noted this fact. The recent Council for its part took
care to point them out, in particular in the Pastoral Constitution
<Gaudium et Spes>. We ourself have already continued these
lines of thought in our encyclical <Populorum Progressio>.
"Today", we said, "the principal fact that we must
all recognize is that the social question has become worldwide"
(4). "A renewed consciousness of the demands of the Gospel
makes it the Church's duty to put herself at the service of all,
to help them grasp their serious problem in all its dimensions,
and to convince them that solidarity in action at this turning
point in human history is a matter of urgency" (5).
6. It will moreover be for the forthcoming Synod of Bishops itself
to study more closely and to examine in greater detail the Church's
mission in the face of grave issues raised today by the question
of justice in the world. But the anniversary of <Rerum Novarum,>
venerable brother, gives us the opportunity today to confide our
preoccupations and thoughts in the face of this problem to you
as President of the Pontifical Commission Justice and Peace and
of the Council of Laity. In this way it is also our wish to offer
these bodies of the Holy See our encouragement in their ecclesial
activity in the service of men.
7. In so doing, our purpose—without however forgetting the permanent problems already dealt with by our predecessors—is to draw attention to a number of questions. These are questions which because of their urgency, extent and complexity must in the years to come take first place among the preoccupations of Christians, so that with other men the latter may dedicate themselves to solving the new difficulties which put the very future of man in jeopardy. It is necessary to situate the problems created by the modern economy in the wider context of a new civilization. These problems include human conditions of production, fairness in the exchange of goods and in the division of wealth, the significance of the increased needs of consumption and the sharing of responsibility. In the present changes, which are so profound and so rapid, each day man discovers himself anew, and he questions himself about the meaning of his own being and of his collective survival. Reluctant to gather the lessons of a past that he considers over and done with and too different from the present, man nevertheless needs to have light shed upon his future—a future which he perceives to be as uncertain as it is changing—by permanent eternal truths. These are truths which are certainly greater than man but, if he so wills, he can himself find their traces (6).
8. A major phenomenon draws our attention, as much in the industrialized
countries as in those which are developing: urbanization.
After long centuries, agrarian civilization is weakening. Is sufficient
attention being devoted to the arrangement and improvement of
the life of the country people, whose inferior and at times miserable
economic situation provokes the flight to the unhappy crowded
conditions of the city outskirts, where neither employment nor
housing awaits them?
This unceasing flight from the land, industrial growth, continual
demographic expansion and the attraction of urban, centers bring
about concentrations of population, the extent of which is difficult
to imagine, for people are already speaking in terms of a "megalopolis"
grouping together tens of millions of persons. Of course there
exist medium-sized towns, the dimension of which ensures a better
balance in the population. While being able to offer employment
to those that progress in agriculture makes available, they permit
an adjustment of the human environment which better avoids the
proletarianism and crowding of the great built-up areas.
9. The inordinate growth of these centers accompanies industrial
expansion, without being identified with it. Based on technological
research and the transformation of nature, industrialization constantly
goes forward, giving proof of incessant creativity. While certain
enterprises develop and are concentrated, others die or change
their location. Thus new social problems are created: professional
or regional unemployment, redeployment and mobility of persons,
permanent adaptation of workers and disparity of conditions in
the different branches of industry. Unlimited competition utilizing
the modern means of publicity incessantly launches new products
and tries to attract the consumer, while earlier industrial installations
which are still capable of functioning become useless. While very
large areas of the population are unable to satisfy their primary
needs, superfluous needs are ingeniously created. It can thus
rightly be asked if, in spite of all his conquests, man Is not
turning back against himself the results of his activity. Having
rationally endeavored to control nature, (7) is he not now becoming
the slave of the objects which he makes?
10. Is not the rise of an urban civilization which accompanies
the advance of industrial civilization a true challenge to the
wisdom of man, to his capacity for organization and to his farseeing
imagination? Within industrial society urbanization up" sets
both the ways of life and the habitual structures of existence:
the family, the neighborhood, and the very framework of the Christian
community. Man is experiencing a new loneliness; it is not in
the face of a hostile nature which it has taken him centuries
to subdue, but in an anonymous crowd which surrounds him and in
which he feels himself a stranger. Urbanization, undoubtedly an
irreversible stage in the development of human societies, confronts
man with difficult problems. How is he to master its growth, regulate
its organization, and successfully accomplish its animation for
the good of all?
In this disordered growth, new proletariats are born. They install
themselves in the heart of the cities sometimes abandoned by the
rich; they dwell on the outskirts—which become a belt of
misery besieging in a still silent protest the luxury which blatantly
cries out from centers of consumption and waste. Instead of favoring
fraternal encounter and mutual aid, the city fosters discrimination
and also indifference. It lends itself to new forms of exploitation
and of domination whereby some people in speculating on the needs
of others derive inadmissible profits. Behind the facades much
misery is hidden, unsuspected even by the closest neighbors; other
forms of misery spread where human dignity founders: delinquency,
criminality, abuse of drugs and eroticism.
11. It is in fact the weakest who are the victims of dehumanizing
living conditions, degrading for con science and harmful for the
family institution. The promiscuity of working people's housing
makes a minimum of intimacy impossible; young couples waiting
in vain for a decent dwelling at a price they can afford are demoralized
and their union can thereby even be endangered; youth escape from
a home which is too confined and seek in the streets compensations
and companionships which cannot be supervised. It is the grave
duty of those responsible to strive to control this process and
to give it direction.
There is an urgent need to remake at the level of the street,
of the neighborhood or of the great agglomerative dwellings the
social fabric whereby man may be able to develop the needs of
his personality. Centers of special interest and of culture must
be created or developed at the community and parish levels with
different forms of associations, recreational centers, and spiritual
and community gatherings where the individual can escape from
isolation and form anew fraternal relationships.
12. To build up the city, the place where men and their expanded
communities exist, to create new modes of neighborliness and relationships,
to perceive an original application of social justice and to undertake
responsibility for this collective future, which is foreseen as
difficult, is a task in which Christians must share. To those
who are heaped up in an urban promiscuity which becomes intolerable
it is necessary to bring a message of hope. This can be done by
brotherhood which is lived and by concrete justice. Let Christians,
conscious of this new responsibility, not lose heart in view of
the vast and faceless society; let them recall Jonah who traversed
Niniveh, the great city, to proclaim therein the good news of
God's mercy and was upheld in his weakness by the sole strength
of the word of Almighty God. In the Bible, the city is in fact
often the place of sin and pride—the pride of man who feels
secure enough to be able to build his life without God and even
to affirm that he is powerful against God. But there is also the
example of Jerusalem, the Holy City, the place where God is encountered,
the promise of the city which comes from on high (8).
13. Urban life and industrial change bring strongly to light questions which until now were poorly grasped. What place, for example, in this world being brought to birth, should be given to youth? Everywhere dialogue is proving to be difficult between youth, with its aspirations, renewal and also insecurity for the future, and the adult generations. It is obvious to all that here we have a source of serious conflicts, division and opting out, even within the family, and a questioning of modes of authority, education for freedom and the handing on of values and beliefs, which strikes at the deep roots of society.
Similarly, in many countries a charter for women which would put an end to an actual discrimination and would establish relationships of equality in rights and of respect for their dignity is the object of study and at times of lively demands. We do not have in mind that false equality which would deny the distinction with woman's proper role, which is of such capital importance, at the heart of the family as well as within society. Developments in legislation should on the contrary be directed to protecting her proper vocation and at the same time recognizing her independence as a person, and her equal rights to participate in cultural, economic, social and political life.
14. As the Church solemnly reaffirmed in the recent Council, "the
beginning, the subject and the goal of all social institutions
is and must be the human person" (9). Every man has the right
to work, to a chance to develop his qualities and his personality
in the exercise of his profession, to equitable remuneration which
will enable him and his family "to lead a worthy life on
the material, social, cultural and spiritual level" (10)
and to assistance in case of need arising from sickness or age.
Although for the defense of these rights democratic societies
accept today the principle of labor union rights, they are not
always open to their exercise. The important role of union organizations
must be admitted: their object is the representation of the various
categories of workers, their lawful collaboration in the economic
advance of society, and the development of the sense of their
responsibility for the realization of the common good. Their activity,
however, is not without its difficulties. Here and there the temptation
can arise of profiting from a position of force to impose, particularly
by strikes—the right to which as a final means of defense
remains certainly recognized—conditions which are too burdensome
for the overall economy and for the social body, or to desire
to obtain in this way demands of a directly political nature.
When it is a question of public service, required for the life
of an entire nation, it is necessary to be able to assess the
limit beyond which the harm caused to society become inadmissible.
15. In short, progress has already been made in introducing, in
the area of human relationships, greater justice and greater sharing
of responsibilities. But in this immense field much remains to
be done. Further reflection, research and experimentation must
be actively pursued, unless one is to be late in meeting the legitimate
aspirations of the workers—aspirations which are being increasingly
asserted according as their education, their consciousness of
their dignity and the strength of their organizations increase.
Egoism and domination are permanent temptations for men. Likewise
an ever finer discernment is needed, in order to strike at the
roots of newly arising situations of injustice and to establish
progressively a justice which will be less and less imperfect.
In industrial change, which demands speedy and constant adaptation,
those who will find themselves injured will be more numerous and
at a greater disadvantage from the point of view of making their
voices heard. The Church directs her attention to those new "poor"—the
handicapped and the maladjusted, the old, different groups of
those on the fringe of society, and so on—in order to recognize
them, help them; defend their place and dignity in a society hardened
by competition and the attraction of success.
16. Among the victims of situations of injustice—unfortunately
no new phenomenon—must be placed those who are discriminated
against, in law or in fact, on account of their race, origin,
color, culture, sex or religion.
Racial discrimination possesses at the moment a character of very
great relevance by reason of the tension which it stirs up both
within countries and on the international level. Men rightly consider
unjustifiable and reject as inadmissible the tendency to maintain
or introduce legislation or behavior systematically inspired by
racialist prejudice. The members of mankind share the same basic
rights and duties, as well as the same supernatural destiny. Within
a country which belongs to each one, all should be equal before
the law, find equal admittance to economic, cultural, civic and
social life and benefit from a fair sharing of the nation's riches.
17. We are thinking of the precarious situation of a great number
of emigrant workers whose condition as foreigners makes it all
the more difficult for them to make any sort of social vindication,
in spite of their real participation in the economic effort of
the country that receives them. It is urgently necessary for people
to go beyond a narrowly nationalist attitude in their regard and
to give them a charter which will assure them a right to emigrate,
favor their integration, facilitate their professional advancement
and give them access to decent housing where, if such is the case,
their families can join them (11).
Linked to this category are the people who, to find work, or to
escape a disaster or a hostile climate, leave their regions and
find themselves without roots among other people.
It is everyone's duty, but especially that of Christians (12),
to work with energy for the establishment of universal brotherhood,
the indispensable basis for authentic justice and the condition
for enduring peace: "We cannot in truthfulness call upon
that God who is the Father of all if we refuse to act in a brotherly
way toward certain men, created to God's image. A man's relationship
with God the Father and his relationship with his brother men
are so linked together that Scripture says: 'He who does not love
does not know God' (I Jn. 4, 8)"(13).
18. With demographic growth, which is particularly pronounced
in the young nations, the number of those failing to find work
and driven to misery or parasitism will grow in the coming years
unless the conscience of man rouses itself and gives rise to a
general movement of solidarity through an effective policy of
investment and of organization of production and trade, as well
as of education. We know the attention given to these problems
within international organizations, and it is our lively wish
that their members will not delay bringing their actions into
line with their declarations.
It is disquieting in this regard to note a kind of fatalism which
is gaining a hold even on people in positions of responsibility.
This feeling sometimes leads to Malthusian solutions inculcated
by active propaganda for contraception and abortion. In this critical
situation, it must on the contrary be affirmed that the family,
without which no society can stand, has a right to the assistance
which will assure it of the conditions for a healthy development.
"It is certain", we said in our encyclical <Populorum
Progressio>, "that public authorities can intervene, within
the limit of their competence, by favoring the availability of
appropriate information and by adopting suitable measures, provided
that these be in conformity with the moral law and that they respect
the rightful freedom of married couples. Where the inalienable
right to marriage and procreation is lacking, human dignity has
ceased to exists"(14).
19. In no other age has the appeal to the imagination of society
been so explicit. To this should be devoted enterprises of invention
and capital as important as those invested for armaments or technological
achievements. If man lets himself rush ahead without foreseeing
in good time the emergence of new social problems, they will become
too grave for a peaceful solution to be hoped for.
20. Among the major changes of our times, we do not wish to forget
to emphasize the growing role being assumed by the media of social
communication and their influence on the transformation of mentalities
of knowledge, of organizations and of society itself. Certainly
they have many positive aspects. Thanks to them news from the
entire world reaches us practically in an instant, establishing
contacts which supersede distances and creating elements of unity
among all men. A greater spread of education and culture is becoming
possible. Nevertheless, by their very action the media of social
communication are reaching the point of representing as it were
a new power. One cannot but ask about those who really hold this
power, the aims that they pursue and the means they use, and finally,
about the effect of their activity on the exercise of individual
liberty, both in the political and ideological spheres and in
social, economic and cultural life. The men who hold this power
have a grave moral responsibility with respect to the truth of
the information that they spread, the needs and the reactions
that they generate and the values which they put forward. In the
case of television, moreover, what is coming into being is an
original mode of knowledge and a new civilization: that of the
image.
Naturally, the public authorities cannot ignore the growing power
and influence of the media of social communication and the advantages
and risks which their use involves for the civic community and
for its development and real perfecting.
Consequently they are called upon to perform their own positive
function for the common good by encouraging every constructive
expression, by supporting individual citizens and groups in defending
the fundamental values of the person and of human society, and
also by taking suitable steps to prevent the spread of what would
harm the common heritage of values on which orderly civil progress
is based (15).
21. While the horizon of man is thus being modified according
to the images that are chosen for him, another transformation
is making itself felt, one which is the dramatic and unexpected
consequence of human activity. Man is suddenly becoming aware
that by an ill-considered exploitation of nature he risks destroying
it and becoming in his turn the victim of this degradation. Not
only is the material environment becoming a permanent menace—pollution
and refuse, new illness and absolute destructive capacity—but
the human framework is no longer under man's control, thus creating
an environment for tomorrow which may well be intolerable. This
is a wide-ranging social problem which concerns the entire human
family.
The Christian must turn to these new perceptions in order to take
on responsibility, together with the rest of men, for a destiny
which from now on is shared by all.
22. While scientific and technological progress continues to overturn man's surroundings, his patterns of knowledge, work, consumption and relationships, two aspirations persistently make themselves felt in these new contexts, and they grow stronger to the extent that he becomes better informed and better educated: the aspiration to equality and the aspiration to participation, two forms of man's dignity and freedom.
23. Through the statement of the rights of man and the seeking
for international agreements for the application of these rights,
progress has been made towards inscribing these two aspirations
in deeds and structures (16). Nevertheless various forms of discrimination
continually reappear—ethnic cultural, religious, political
and so on. In fact, human rights are still too often disregarded,
if not scoffed at, or else they receive only formal recognition.
In many cases legislation does not keep up with real situations.
Legislation is necessary, but it is not sufficient for setting
up true relationships of justice and equity. In teaching us charity,
the Gospel instructs us in the preferential respect due to the
poor and the special situation they have in society: the more
fortunate should renounce some of their rights so as to place
their goods more generously at the service of others. If, beyond
legal rules, there is really no deeper feeling of respect for
and service to others, then even equality before the law can serve
as an alibi for flagrant discrimination, continued exploitation
and actual contempt. Without a renewed education in solidarity,
an overemphasis of equality can give rise to an individualism
in which each one claims his own rights without wishing to be
answerable for the common good.
In this field, everyone sees the highly important contribution
of the Christian spirit, which moreover answers man's yearning
to be loved. "Love for man, the prime value of the earthly
order" ensures the conditions for peace, both social peace
and international peace, by affirming our universal brotherhood
(17).
24. The two aspirations, to equality and to participation, seek
to promote a democratic type of society. Various models are proposed,
some are tried out, none of them gives complete satisfaction,
and the search goes on between ideological and pragmatic tendencies.
The Christian has the duty to take part in this search and in
the organization and life of political society. As a social being,
man builds his destiny within a series of particular groupings
which demand, as their completion and as a necessary condition
for their development, a vaster society, one of a universal character,
the political society. All particular activity must be placed
within that wider society, and thereby it takes on the dimension
of the common good. (18)
This indicates the importance of education for life in society,
in which there are called to mind, not only information on each
one's rights, but also their necessary correlative: the recognition
of the duties of each one in regard to others. The sense. and
practice of duty are themselves conditioned by self-mastery and
by the acceptance of responsibility and of the limits placed upon
the freedom of the individual or of the group.
25. Political activity—need one remark that we are dealing
primarily with an activity, not an ideology?—should be the
projection of a plan of society which is consistent in its concrete
means and in its inspiration, and which springs from a complete
conception of man's vocation and of its differing social expressions.
It is not for the State or even for political parties, which would
be closed unto themselves, to try to impose an ideology by means
that would lead to a dictatorship over minds, the worst kind of
all. It is for cultural and religious groupings, in the freedom
of acceptance which they presume, to develop in the social body,
disinterestedly and in their own ways, those ultimate convictions
on the nature, origin and end of man and society.
In this field, it is well to keep in mind the principle proclaimed
at the Second Vatican Council: "The truth cannot impose itself
except by virtue of its own truth, and it makes its entrance into
the mind at once quietly and with power" (19).
26. Therefore the Christian who wishes to live his faith in a
political activity which he thinks of as service cannot without
contradicting himself adhere to ideological systems which radically
or substantially go against his faith and his concept of man.
He cannot adhere to the Marxist ideology, to its atheistic materialism,
to its dialectic of violence and to the way it absorbs individual
freedom in the collectivity, at the same time denying all transcendence
to man and his personal and collective history; nor can be adhere
to the liberal ideology which believes it exalts individual freedom
by with drawing it from every limitation, by stimulating it through
exclusive seeking of interest and power, and by considering social
solidarities as more or less automatic consequences of individual
initiatives, not as an aim and a major criterion of the value
of the social organization.
27. Is there need to stress the possible ambiguity of every social
ideology? Sometimes it leads political or social activity to be
simply the application of an abstract, purely theoretical idea;
at other times it is thought which becomes a mere instrument at
the service of activity as a simple means of a strategy.
In both cases is it not man that risks finding himself alienated?
The Christian faith is above and is sometimes opposed to the ideologies,
in that it recognizes God, who is transcendent and the Creator,
and who, through all the levels of creation, calls on man as endowed
with responsibility and freedom.
28. There would also be the danger of giving adherence to an ideology
which does not rest on a true and organic doctrine, to take refuge
in it as a final and sufficient explanation of everything, and
thus to build a new idol, accepting, at times without being aware
of doing so, its totalitarian and coercive character. And people
imagine they find in it a justification for their activity, even
violent activity, and an adequate response to a generous desire
to serve. The desire remains but it allows itself to be consumed
by an ideology which, even if it suggests certain paths to man's
liberation, ends up by making him a slave.
29. It has been possible today to speak of a retreat of ideologies.
In this respect the present time may be favorable for an openness
to the concrete transcendence of Christianity. It may also be
a more accentuated sliding towards a new positivism: universalized
technology as the dominant form of activity, as the overwhelming
pattern of existence, even as a language, without the question
of its meaning being really asked.
30. But outside of this positivism which reduces man to a single dimension even if it be an important one today and by so doing mutilates him, the Christian encounters in his activity concrete historical movements sprung from ideologies and in part distinct from them. Our venerated predecessor Pope John XXIII in <Pacem in Terris> already showed that it is possible to make a distinction: "Neither can false philosophical teachings regarding the nature, origin and destiny of the universe and of man be identified with historical movements that have economic, social. cultural or political ends, not even when these movements have originated from those teachings and have drawn and still draw inspiration therefrom. Because the teachings, once they are drawn up and defined, remain always the same, while the movements, being concerned with historical situations in constant evolution, cannot but be influenced by these latter and cannot avoid, therefore, being subject to changes, even of a profound nature. Besides, who can deny that those movements, in so far as they conform to the dictates of right reason and are interpreters of the lawful aspirations of the human person, contain elements that are positive and deserving of approval?" (20).
31. Some Christians are today attracted by socialist currents and their various developments. They try to recognize therein a certain number of aspirations which they carry within themselves in the name of their faith. They feel that they are part of that historical current and wish to play a part within it. Now this historical current takes on, under the same name, different forms according to different continents and cultures, even if it drew its inspiration, and still does in many cases, from ideologies incompatible with faith. Careful judgment is called for. Too often Christians attracted by socialism tend to idealize it in terms which, apart from anything else, are very general: a will for justice, solidarity and equality. They refuse to recognize the limitations of the historical socialist movements, which remain conditioned by the ideologies from which they originated. Distinctions must be made to guide concrete choices between the various levels of expression of socialism: a generous aspiration and a seeking for a more just society, historical movements with a political organization and aim, and an ideology which claims to give a complete and self-sufficient picture of man. Nevertheless, these distinctions must not lead one to consider such levels as completely separate and independent. The concrete link which, according to circumstances, exists between them must be clearly marked out. This insight will enable Christians to see the degree of commitment possible along these lines, while safeguarding the values, especially those of liberty, responsibility and openness to the spiritual, which guarantee the integral development of man.
32. Other Christians even ask whether an historical development
of Marxism might not authorize certain concrete rapprochements.
They note in fact a certain splintering of Marxism, which until
now showed itself to be a unitary ideology which explained in
atheistic terms the whole of man and the world since it did not
go outside their development process. Apart from the ideological
confrontation officially separating the various champions of Marxism-Leninism
in their individual interpretations of the thought of its founders,
and apart from the open opposition between the political systems
which make use of its name today, some people lay down distinctions
between Marxism's various levels of expression.
33. For some, Marxism remains essentially the active practice
of class struggle. Experiencing the ever present and continually
renewed force of the relationships of domination and exploitation
among men, they reduce Marxism to no more than a struggle—at
times with no other purpose—to be pursued and even stirred
up in permanent fashion. For others, it is first and foremost
the collective exercise of political and economic power under
the direction of a single party, which would be the sole expression
and guarantee of the welfare of all, and would deprive individuals
and other groups of any possibility of initiative and choice.
At a third level, Marxism' whether in power or not, is viewed
as a socialist ideology based on historical materialism and the
denial of everything transcendent. At other times, finally, it
presents itself in a more attenuated form, one also more attractive
to the modern mind: as a scientific activity, as a rigorous method
of examining social and political reality, and as the rational
link, tested by history, between theoretical knowledge and the
practice of revolutionary transformation. Although this type of
analysis gives a privileged position to certain aspects of reality
to the detriment of the rest, and interprets them in the light
of its ideology, it nevertheless furnishes some people not only
with a working tool but also a certitude preliminary to action:
the claim to decipher in a scientific manner the mainsprings of
the evolution of society.
34. While, through the concrete existing form of Marxism, one
can distinguish these various aspects and the questions they pose
for the reflection and activity of Christians, it would be illusory
and dangerous to reach a point of forgetting the intimate link
which radically binds them together, to accept the elements of
Marxist analysis without recognizing their relationships with
ideology, and to enter into the practice of class struggle and
its Marxist interpretations, while failing to note the kind of
totalitarian and violent society to which this process leads.
35. On another side, we are witnessing a renewal of the liberal ideology. This current asserts itself both in the name of economic efficiency, and for the defense of the individual against the increasingly overwhelming hold of organizations, and as a reaction against the totalitarian tendencies of political powers. Certainly, personal initiative must be maintained and developed. But do not Christians who take this path tend to idealize liberalism in their turn, making it a proclamation in favor of freedom? They would like a new model, more adapted to present-day conditions, while easily forgetting that at the very root of philosophical liberalism is an erroneous affirmation of the autonomy of the individual in his activity, his motivation and the exercise of his liberty. Hence, the liberal ideology likewise calls for careful discernment on their part.
36. In this renewed encounter of the various ideologies, the Christian will draw from the sources of his faith and the Church's teaching the necessary principles and suitable criteria to avoid permitting himself to be first attracted by and then imprisoned within a system whose limitations and totalitarianism may well become evident to him too late, if he does nor perceive them in their roots. Going beyond every system, without however failing to commit himself concretely to serving his brothers, he will assert, in the very midst of his options, the specific character of the Christian contribution for a positive transformation of society (21 ).
37. Today moreover the weaknesses of the ideologies are better
perceived through the concrete systems in which they are trying
to affirm themselves. Bureaucratic socialism, technocratic capitalism
and authoritarian democracy are showing how difficult it is to
solve the great human problem of living together in justice and
equality. How in fact could they escape the materialism, egoism
or constraint which inevitably go with them? This is the source
of a protest which is springing up more or less everywhere, as
a sign of a deep-seated sickness, while at the same time we are
witnessing the rebirth of what it is agreed to call "utopias".
These claim to resolve the political problem of modern societies
better than the ideologies. It would be dangerous to disregard
this. The appeal to a utopia is often a convenient excuse for
those who wish to escape from concrete tasks in order to take
refuge in an imaginary world. To live in a hypothetical future
is a facile alibi for rejecting immediate responsibilities. But
it must clearly be recognized that this kind of criticism of existing
society often provokes the forward-looking imagination both to
perceive in the present the disregarded possibility hidden within
it, and to direct itself towards a fresh future; it thus sustains
social dynamism by the confidence that it gives to the inventive
powers of the human mind and heart; and, if it refuses no overture,
it can also meet the Christian appeal. The Spirit of the Lord,
who animates man renewed in Christ, continually breaks down the
horizons within which his understanding likes to find security
and the limits to which his activity would willingly restrict
itself; ;here dwells within him a power which urges him to go
beyond every system and every ideology. At the heart of the world
there dwells the mystery of man discovering himself to be God's
son in the course of a historical and psychological process in
which constraint and freedom as well as the weight of sin and
the breath of the Spirit alternate and struggle for the upper
hand.
The dynamism of Christian faith here triumphs over the narrow
calculations of egoism. Animated by the power of the Spirit of
Jesus Christ, the Savior of mankind, and upheld by hope, the Christian
involves himself in the building up of the human city, one that
is to be peaceful, just and fraternal and acceptable as an offering
to God. (22) In fact, "the expectation of a new earth must
not weaken but rather stimulate our concern for cultivating this
one. For here grows the body of a new human family, a body which
even now is able to give some kind of foreshadowing of the new
age" (23).
38. In this world dominated by scientific and technological change,
which threatens to drag it towards a new posivitism, another more
fundamental doubt is raised. Having subdued nature by using his
reason, man now finds that he himself is as it were imprisoned
within his own rationality; he in turn becomes the object of science.
The "human sciences" are today enjoying a significant
flowering. On the one hand they are subjecting to critical and
radical examination the hitherto accepted knowledge about man,
on the grounds that this knowledge seems either too empirical
or too theoretical. On the other hand, methodological necessity
and ideological presuppositions too often lead the human sciences
to isolate, in the various situations, certain aspects of man,
and yet to give these an explanation which claims to be complete
or at least an interpretation which is meant to be all-embracing
from a purely quantitative or phenomenological point of view.
This scientific reduction betrays a dangerous presupposition.
To give a privileged position in this way to such an aspect of
analysis is to mutilate man and, under the pretext of a scientific
procedure, to make it impossible to understand man in his totality.
39. One must be no less attentive to the action which the human
sciences can instigate, giving rise to the elaboration of models
of society to be subsequently imposed on men as scientifically
tested types of behavior. Man can then become the object of manipulations
directing his desires and needs and modifying his behavior and
even his system of values. There is no doubt that there exists
here a grave danger for the societies of tomorrow and for man
himself. For even if all agree to build a new society at the service
of men, it is still essential to know what sort of man is in question.
40. Suspicion of the human sciences affects the Christian more than others, but it does not find him disarmed. For, as we ourself wrote in <Populorum Progressio>, it is here that there is found the specific contribution of the Church to civilizations: "Sharing the noblest aspirations of men and suffering when she sees them not satisfied, she wishes to help them attain their full flowering, and that is why she offers men what she possesses as her characteristic attribute: a global vision of man and of the human race". (24) Should the Church in its turn contest the proceedings of the human sciences, and condemn their pretentions? As in the case of the natural sciences, the Church has confidence in this research also and urges Christians to play an active part in it (25). Prompted by the same scientific demands and the desire to know man better, but at the same time enlightened by their faith, Christians who devote themselves to the human sciences will begin a dialogue between the Church and this new field of discovery, a dialogue which promises to be fruitful. Of course, each individual scientific discipline will be able, in its own particular sphere, to grasp only a partial—yet true—aspect of man; the complete picture and the full meaning will escape it. But within these limits the human sciences give promise of a positive function that the Church willingly recognizes. They can even widen the horizons of human liberty to a greater extent than the conditioning circumstances perceived enable one to foresee. They could thus assist Christian social morality, which no doubt will see its field restricted when it comes to suggesting certain models of society, while its function of making a critical judgment and taking an overall view will be strengthened by its showing the relative character of the behavior and values presented by such and such a society as definitive and inherent in the very nature of man. These sciences are a condition at once indispensable and inadequate for a better discovery of what is human. They are a language which becomes more and more complex, yet one that deepens rather than solves the mystery of the heart of man; nor does it provide the complete and definitive answer to the desire which springs from his innermost being.
41. This better knowledge of man makes it possible to pass a better
critical judgment upon and to elucidate a fundamental notion that
remains at the basis of modern societies as their motive, their
measure and their goal: namely, progress. Since the nineteenth
century, western societies and, as a result, many others have
put their hopes in ceaselessly renewed and indefinite progress.
They saw this progress as man's effort to free himself in face
of the demands of nature and of social constraints; progress was
the condition for and the yardstick of human freedom. Progress,
spread by the modern media of information and by the demand for
wider knowledge and greater consumption, has become an omnipresent
ideology. Yet a doubt arises today regarding both its value and
its result What is the meaning of this never-ending, breathless
pursuit of a progress that always eludes one just when one believes
one has conquered it sufficiently in order to enjoy it in peace?
If it is not attained, it leaves one dissatisfied. Without doubt,
there has been just condemnation of the limits and even the misdeeds
of a merely quantitative economic growth; there is a desire to
attain objectives of a qualitative order also. The quality and
the truth of human relations, the degree of participation and
of responsibility, are no less significant and important for the
future of society than the quantity and variety of the goods produced
and consumed.
Overcoming the temptation to wish to measure everything in terms
of efficiency and of trade, and in terms of the interplay of forces
and interests, man today wishes to replace these quantitative
criteria with the intensity of communication, the spread of knowledge
and culture, mutual service and a combining of efforts for a common
task. Is not genuine progress to be found in the development of
moral consciousness, which will lead man to exercise a wider solidarity
and to open himself freely to others and to God? For a Christian,
progress necessarily comes up against the eschatological mystery
of death. The death of Christ and his resurrection and the outpouring
of the Spirit of the Lord help man to place his freedom, in creativity
and gratitude, within the context of the truth of all progress
and the only hope which does not deceive (26).
42. In the face of so many new questions the Church makes an effort
to reflect in order to give an answer, in its own sphere, to men's
expectations. If today the problems seem original in their breadth
and their urgency, is man without the means of solving them? It
is with all its dynamism that the social teaching of the Church
accompanies men in their search. If it does not intervene to authenticate
a given structure or to propose a ready-made model, it does not
thereby limit itself to recalling general principles. It develops
through reflection applied to the changing situations of this
world, under the driving force of the Gospel as the source of
renewal when its message is accepted in its totality and with
all its demands. It also develops with the sensitivity proper
to the Church which is characterized by a disinterested will to
serve and by attention to the poorest.
Finally, it draws upon its rich experience of many centuries which
enables it, while continuing its permanent preoccupations, to
undertake the daring and creative innovations which the present
state of the world requires.
43. There is a need to establish a greater justice in the sharing
of goods, both within national communities and on the international
level. In international exchanges there is a need to go beyond
relationships based on force, in order to arrive at agreements
reached with the good of all in mind. Relationships based on force
have never in fact established justice in a true and lasting manner,
even if at certain times the alteration of positions can often
make it possible to find easier conditions for dialogue. The use
of force moreover leads to the setting in motion of opposing forces,
and from this springs a climate of struggle which opens the way
to situations of extreme violence and to abuses (27).
But, as we have often stated, the most important duty in the realm
of justice is to allow each country to promote its own development,
within the framework of a cooperation free from any spirit of
domination, whether economic or political. The complexity of the
problems raised is certainly great, in the present intertwining
of mutual dependences. Thus it is necessary to have the courage
to undertake a revision of the relationships between nations,
whether it is a question of the international division of production,
the structure of exchanges, the control of profits, the monetary
system—without forgetting the actions of human solidarity—to
question the models of growth of the rich nations and change people's
outlooks, so that they may realize the prior call of international
duty, and to renew international organizations so that they may
increase in effectiveness.
44. Under the driving force of new systems of production, national
frontiers are breaking down, and we can see new economic powers
emerging, the multinational enterprise, which by the concentration
and flexibility of their means can conduct autonomous strategies
which are largely independent of the national political powers
and therefore not subject to control from the point of view of
the common good. By extending their activities, these private
organizations can lead to a new and abusive form of economic domination
on the social, cultural and even political level. The excessive
concentration of means and powers that Pope Pius XI already condemned
on the fortieth anniversary of <Rerum Novarum> is taking
on a new and very real image.
45. Today men yearn to free themselves from need and dependence.
But this liberation starts with the interior freedom that men
must find again with regard to their goods and their powers; they
will never reach it except through a transcendent love for man,
and, in consequence, through a genuine readiness to serve. Otherwise,
as one can see only too clearly, the most revolutionary ideologies
lead only to a change of masters; once installed in power in their
turn, these new masters surround themselves with privileges, limit
freedom and allow other forms of injustice to become established.
Thus many people are reaching the point of questioning the very
model of society. The ambition of many nations, in the competition
that sets them in opposition and which carries them along, is
to attain technological, economic and military power. This ambition
then stands in the way of setting up structures in which the rhythm
of progress would be regulated with a view to greater justice,
instead of accentuating inequalities and living in a climate of
distrust and struggle which would unceasingly compromise peace.
46. Is it not here that there appears a radical limitation to
economics? Economic activity is necessary and, if it is at the
service of man, it can be "a source of brotherhood and a
sign of Providence" (28). It is the occasion of concrete
exchanges between man, of rights recognized, of services rendered
and of dignity affirmed in work. Though it is often a field of
confrontation and domination, it can give rise to dialogue and
foster cooperation. Yet it runs the risk of taking up too much
strength and freedom (29). This is why the need is felt to pass
from economics to politics. It is true that in the term "politics"
many confusions are possible and must be clarified, but each man
feels that in the social and economic field, both national and
international, the ultimate decision rests with political power.
Political power, which is the natural and necessary link for ensuring
the cohesion of the social body, must have as its aim the achievement
of the common good. While respecting the legitimate liberties
of individuals, families and subsidiary groups, it acts in such
a way as to create, effectively and for the well-being of all,
the conditions required for attaining man's true and complete
good, including his spiritual end. It acts within the limits of
its competence, which can vary from people to people and from
country to country. It always intervenes with care for justice
and with devotion to the common good, for which: it holds final
responsibility. It does not, for all that, deprive individuals
and intermediary bodies of the field of activity and responsibility
which are proper to them and which lead them to collaborate in
the attainment of this common good. In fact, "the true aim
of all social activity should be to help individual members of
the social body, but never to destroy or absorb them" (30).
Ac cording to the vocation proper to is, the political power must
know how to stand aside from particular interests in order to
view its responsibility with regard to the good of all men, even
going beyond national limits. To take politics seriously at its
different levels—local, regional, national and worldwide—is
to affirm the duty of man, of every man, to recognize the concrete
reality and the value of the freedom of choice that is offered
to him to seek to bring about both the good of the city and of
the nation and of mankind. Politics are a demanding manner—but
not the only one—of living the Christian commitment to the
service of others. Without of course solving every problem, it
endeavors to apply solutions to the relationships men have with
one another. The domain of politics is wide and comprehensive,
but it is not exclusive. An attitude of encroachment which would
tend to set up politics as an absolute value would bring serious
danger. While recognizing the autonomy of the reality of politics,
Christians who are invited to take up political activity should
try to make their choices consistent with the Gospel and, in the
framework of a legitimate plurality, to give both personal collective
witness to the seriousness of their faith by effective and disinterested
service of men.
47. The passing to the political dimension also expresses a demand
made by the man of today: a greater sharing in responsibility
and in decision-making. This legitimate aspiration becomes more
evident as the cultural level rises, as the sense of freedom develops
and as man becomes more aware of how, in a world facing an uncertain
future, the choices of today already condition the life of tomorrow.
In <Mater et Magistra> (31) Pope John XXIII stressed how
much the admittance to responsibility is a basic demand of man's
nature, a concrete exercise of his freedom and a path to his development,
and he showed how, in economic life and particularly in enterprise,
this sharing in responsibilities should be ensured.(32) Today
the field is wider, and extends to the social and political sphere
in which a reasonable sharing in responsibility and in decisions
must be established and strengthened. Admittedly, it is true that
the choices proposed for a decision are more and more complex;
the considerations that must be borne in mind are numerous and
foreseeing of the consequences involves risk, even if new sciences
strive to enlighten freedom at these important moments. However,
although limits are sometimes called for, these obstacles must
not slow down the giving of wider participation in working out
decisions, making choices and putting them into practice. In order
to counterbalance increasing technocracy, modern forms of democracy
must be devised, not only making it possible for each man to become
informed and to express himself, but also by involving him in
a shared responsibility.
Thus human groups will gradually begin to share and to live as
communities. Thus freedom, which too often asserts itself as a
claim for autonomy by opposing the freedom of others, will develop
in its deepest human reality: to involve itself and to spend itself
in building up active and lived solidarity. But, for the Christian,
it is by losing himself in God who sets him free that man finds
true freedom, renewed in the death and resurrection of the Lord.
48. In the social sphere, the Church has always wished to assume
a double function: first to enlighten minds in order to assist
them to discover the truth and to find the right path to follow
amid the different teachings that call for their attention; and
secondly to take part in action and to spread, with a real care
for service and effectiveness, the energies of the Gospel. Is
it not in order to be faithful to this desire that the Church
has sent on an apostolic mission among the workers priests who,
by sharing fully the condition of the worker, are at that level
the witnesses to the Church's solicitude and seeking?
It is to all Christians that we address a fresh and insistent
call to action. In our encyclical on the Development of Peoples
we urged that all should set themselves to the task: "Laymen
should take up as their own proper task the renewal of the temporal
order. If the role of the hierarchy is to teach and to interpret
authentically the norms of morality to be followed in this matter,
it belongs to the laity, without waiting passively for orders
and directives, to take the initiatives freely and to infuse a
Christian spirit into the mentality, customs, laws and structures
of the community in which they live" (33). Let each one examine
himself, to see what he has done up to now, and what he ought
to do. It is not enough to recall principles, state intentions,
point to crying injustice and utter prophetic denunciations; these
words will lack real weight unless they are accompanied for each
individual by a livelier awareness of personal responsibility
and by effective action. It is too easy to throw back on others
responsibility for injustice, if at the same time one does not
realize how each one shares in it personally, and how personal
conversion is needed first. This basic humility will rid action
of all inflexibility and sectarianism, it will also avoid discouragement
in the face of a task which seems limitless in size. The Christian's
hope comes primarily from the fact that he knows that the Lord
is working with us in the world, continuing in his Body which
is the Church—and, through the Church, in the whole of mankind—the
Redemption which was accomplished on the Cross and which burst
forth in victory on the morning of the Resurrection (34). This
hope springs also from the fact that the Christian knows that
other men are at work, to undertake actions of justice and peace
working for the same ends. For beneath an outward appearance of
indifference, in the heart of every man there is a will to live
in brotherhood and a thirst for justice and peace, which is to
be expanded.
49. Thus, amid the diversity of situations, functions and organizations, each one must determine, in his conscience, the actions which he is called to share in. Surrounded by various currents into which, besides legitimate aspirations, there insinuate themselves more ambiguous tendencies, the Christian must make a wise and vigilant choice and avoid involving himself in collaboration without conditions and contrary to the principles of a true humanism, even in the name of a genuinely left solidarity. If in fact he wishes to play a specific part as a Christian in accordance with his faith—a part that unbelievers themselves expect of him—he must take care in the midst of his active commitment to clarify his motives and to rise above the objectives aimed at, by taking a more all-embracing view which will avoid the danger of selfish particularism and oppressive totalitarianism.
50. In concrete situations, and taking account of solidarity in
each person's life, one must recognize a legitimate variety of
possible options. The same Christian faith can lead to different
commitments (35). The Church invites all Christians to take up
a double task of inspiring and of innovating, in order to make
structures evolve, so as to adapt them to the real needs of today.
From Christians who at first sight seem to be in opposition, as
a result of starting from differing options, she asks an effort
at mutual understanding of the other's positions and motives;
a loyal examination of one's behavior and its correctness will
suggest to each one an attitude of more profound charity which,
while recognizing the differences, believes nonetheless in the
possibility of convergence and unity. "The bonds which unite
the faithful are mightier than anything which divides them"
(36).
It is true that man; people, in the midst of modern structures
and conditioning circumstances, are determined by their habits
of thought and their functions, even apart from the safeguarding
of material interests. Others feel so deeply the solidarity of
classes and cultures that they reach the point of sharing without
reserve all the judgments and options of their surroundings (37).
Each one will take great care to examine himself and to bring
about that true freedom according to Christ which makes one receptive
to the universal in the very midst of the most particular conditions.
51. It is in this regard too that Christian organizations, under
their different forms, have a responsibility for collective action.
Without putting themselves in the place of the institutions of
civil society, they have to express, in their own way and rising
above their particular nature, the concrete demands of the Christian
faith for a just, and consequently necessary, transformation of
society (38).
Today more than ever the World of God will be unable to be proclaimed
and heard unless it is accompanied by the witness of the power
of the Holy Spirit, working within the action of Christian in
the service of their brothers, at the points in which their existence
and their future are at stake.
52. In expressing these reflections to you, venerable brother,
we are of course aware that we have not dealt with all the social
problems that today face the man of faith and men of goodwill.
Our recent declarations—to which has been added your message
of a short time ago on the occasion of the launching of the Second
Development Decade—particularly concerning the duties of
the community of nations in the serious question of the integral
and concerted development of man are still fresh in people's minds.
We address these present reflections to you with the aim of offering
to the Council of the Laity and the Pontifical Commission Justice
and Peace some fresh contributions, as well as an encouragement,
for the pursuit of their task of "awakening the People of
the God to a full understanding of its role at the present time"
and of "promoting the apostolate on the international level"
(39).
It is with these sentiments, venerable brother, that we impart
to you our Apostolic Blessing.
From the Vatican, 14 May 1971.
1) <Gaudium et Spes>, 10: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 1033.
2) <AAS> 23 (1931), p. 209 ff.
3) <AAS> 53 (1961), p. 429.
4) 3: <AAS> 59 (1967), p. 258.
5) <Ibidem>, 1: p. 257.
6) Cf. 2 Cor 4:17.
7) <Populorum Progressio>, 25: <AAS> 59 (1967), pp.
269-270.
8) Cf. Rev 3:12; 21:2.
9) <Gaudium et Spes>, 25: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 1045.
10) <Ibidem>, 67: p. 1089,
11) <Populorum Progressio>, 69: <AAS> 59 (1967), pp.
290-291.
12) Cf. Mt 25:35.
13) <Nostra Aetate>, 5: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 743.
14) 37: <AAS> 59 (1967), p. 276.
15) <Inter Mirifica>,12: <AAS> 56 (1964), p. 149.
16) Cf. <Pacem in Terris>: <AAS> 55 (1963), p. 261
ff.
17) Cf. <Message for the World Day of Peace>, 1971: <AAS>
63 (1971), pp. 5-9.
18) Cf. <Gaudium et Spes>, 74: -<AAS> 58 (1966), pp.
1095-1096.
19) <Dignitatis Humanae>, 1: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 930.
20) <AAS> 55 (1963), p. 300.
21) Cf. <Gaudium et Spes>, 11: <AAS> 58 (1966), p.
1033.
22) Cf. Rom 15:16.
23) <Gaudium et Spes>, 39: <AAS> 58 (1966), p, 1057
24) <Populorum Progressio>, 13: <AAS> 59 (1967), p.
264.
25) Cf. <Gaudium et Spes>, 36:—<AAS> 58 (1966),
p. 1054.
26) Cf. Rom 5:5
27) <Populorum Progressio>, 56 95.: <AAS> 59 (1967),
pp. 235 ff.
28) <Ibidem>, 86: p. 299.
29) <Gaudium et Spes>, 63: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 1085.
30) <Quadragesimo Anno>: <AAS> 23 (1931), p. 203,
cf. <Mater et Magistra>: <AAS> 53 (1961), pp. 414,
428; <Gaudium et Spes>, 74-76: <AAS> 58 (1966), pp.
1095-1100.
31) <AAS> 53 (19fil), pp. 420-422.
32) <Gaudium et Spes>, 68, 75: <AAS> 58 (1966), pp.
1089-1090 1097.
33) 81: <AAS> 59 (1967); pp. 296-297.
34) Cf. Mt 28:30; Phil 2:8-11.
35) <Gaudium et Spes>, 43: <AAS> 58 (1966), p. 1061.
36) <Ibidem>, 93: p. 1113.
37) Cf. 1 Thess 5:21.
38) <Lumen Gentium>, 31: <AAS> 57 (1965), pp. 37-38;
<Apostolicam Actuositatem>, 5: <AAS> 58 (1966), p.
842.
39) <Catholicam Christi Ecclesiam>, <AAS> 59 (1967),
Pp. 27 and 26.
Sisters of Notre Dame de Namur Justice and Peace office * 125 Michigan Ave NE Room 436 * Washington DC 20017
Phone: 202 884 9772 * www.sndden.wordpress.com
September 14, 2011